For a website that spends so much time and energy combating FUD from Microsoft, and the MPAA and RIAA, it is baffling that FUD that was paid for and is pushed by the oil industry would make the front page here.The "article" is not an article, but a press release written by an employee of a public affairs company.
"Tom Harris is mechanical engineer and Ottawa Director of High Park Group, a public affairs and public policy company."
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners. Comments are owned by the Poster. The Rest © 1997-2008 SourceForge, Inc.
I'm not... (Score:3, Insightful)
They troll their stories from time to time to get a giant response.
Re:I'm not... (Score:2)
ah well. Since your paying us a visit Wil, how about taking a moment to drop something in for the SMITE [slashdot.org]?
Re:I'm not... (Score:2)
Re:I'm not... (Score:2)
Re:I'm not... (Score:1)
I can tell just by looking at you... (Score:1)
Remember Wil, don't feed the trolls. They can multiply exponentionally, and eat y
Did you notice the submitter link? (Score:1)
Techocrat bit too - and then spat it out (Score:2)
Perhaps, if you are not reading Technocrat, you may wish to do so.
Of course, I am a bit biased - Bruce made me an editor (alth
Slashdot and Declining Standards (Score:2)
Basically, they are going down.
Solution? Go and create some stories. Do interv
Re:Slashdot and Declining Standards (Score:2)
The second sign of decline is the renewed slashdot layout that attracts a former slashdot reader again?
Re:Slashdot and Declining Standards (Score:2)
As for the number of comments per article, that seems pretty steady. It plateaued a while ago, but I don't think it has gone down.
Of course maybe my baseline is too long.
When is the industry allowed to comment then? (Score:2)
Say I work in the medical device industry, in engineering on very expensive MRI