> Tell your past self to start betting people . . . that the World Trade Center will get totally knocked down by a terrorist attack no later than 2002

You'd find your past self with a lot of 'splaining to do down in Guantanamo when you collect.

> Where in the hell can you find (good) beer for $1?

Czech Republic.

First, using the same data structures is fairly easy across multiple languages because the same object-oriented principles usually apply. Second, if you use web services to be consumed across your platforms, you don't need to duplicate business logic in more than one language (you can at least minimize it). Third, you're mentioning three mobile platforms that pretty much require an OO approach in their respective languages (C#, Java, and Objective-C), so why would you throw out the entire approach for the web?

Sure, but all that stuff can be forged. Of course, it would be ridiculous to forge that stuff, wouldn't it? In fact, it seems (to me) almost as ridiculous to falsely claim that one's sister has been sued as it would be to actively falsify evidence. Sure, I wouldn't put any money on that claim being true, but somebody getting stressed out about it to this extent seems kind of sad.

No evidence, nothing.

What evidence would you deem sufficient for claiming that one's sister had been sued by the RIAA?

I can say that it's not just you. LOTS of people are wrong about this.

There are plenty of reasons, but one of the best ones is that "web development" isn't necessarily separate from other development. If you're using the same data structures and operations across multiple targets (web, desktop, mobile), OO is definitely a good idea.

Movies are popular attractions for dates*. You can take a date to a bad movie, and won't necessarily reflect poorly upon you. But if you take a date to a bad movie because happened to be cheaper than a putative good movie, you're just not getting laid**.

* A social activity with a potential or established romantic goals.
** Sexual intercourse.

You should stop coding, too, which would free up more time to do nothing. You'll soon get bored of doing nothing, but that's what TV is for, amiright?

You lost them at "locally."

You read the entire patent, and didn't see the method? That makes me think you stopped after the abstract. The description of what they're patenting is quite verbose.