Forgot your password?

typodupeerror

Comment: Re:That decides it (Score 1) 509

Vote with your money

This is the crux of it, however it raises an issue that I haven't seen mentioned yet, the price of games.

It has long been argued (largely unconvincingly admittedly) that piracy "costs" developer money. If the MS DRM is shown to "work" then there is an argument to be made that the games released on both platforms should be cheaper on the Xbox (especially if the opportunity for earning more money on resale is there)? If the publishers buy into that theory and the Xbox One is cheaper to run then I think, for a lot of people, the question will become muddier. Similarly if publishers begin to see better rates of legitimate purchases on Xbox they may favour it with more exclusives (or at least release the Xbox version first).

All theory of course, but as someone who only uses a console to play games and has little time to do anything that would require more freedom than the Xbox allows the practical differences between the Xbox One and PS4 are negligible and other factors are likely to take greater sway.

I think this will be an interesting test. With the consoles releasing more or less side by side and with similar capabilities it will perhaps help show once and for all whether DRM can be done in a way that makes customers prefer it.

Comment: What I would like from the next series (Score 5, Interesting) 375

by Chuck Chunder (#43887863) Attached to: Matt Smith Leaves "Doctor Who"
Less SHOUTING. Too often they seem to try and create a sense of excitement through the sole mechanism of having the Doctor get excited and shouty. I don't think it Matt Smith's fault, he does do some of the darker, more ponderous moments very well. I think the situation should be exciting in itself and the Doctor then rising above it.

Comment: Re:I don't know *anything* about this (Score 3, Insightful) 70

by Chuck Chunder (#43467851) Attached to: Dell Signs Agreement To Cap Icahn's Share Ownership
There is a clear difference between a company deciding how it sells shares it currently owns in an IPO and restricting someone from buying shares from other parties.

The article isn't entirely clear though, at first glance it makes it sound like Icahn is being frozen out from buying the company, however I think his offer as far as that goes is still on the table. This agreement seems to be more about preventing a hostile takeover, ie Ichan gaining enough shares/influence in the meantime to control the process and have his offer approved with less oversight.

As it's an agreement Ichan is presumably OK with it though if you were a Dell shareholder you might be annoyed that the company has taken someone who might buy your shares out of the market for a while.

Comment: Strange how things turn out (Score 2) 181

by Chuck Chunder (#42732283) Attached to: Mozilla To Enable Click-To-Play For All Firefox Plugins By Default
Remember back when the EOLAS patent was being waved about and it was suggested that browser makers may have to implement "click to play" to avoid it.

Strange that a year after EOLAS gets their arse handed to them in a Texas court we get to a similar place for entirely different reasons.

Comment: Re:Multisigning (Score 1) 75

by Chuck Chunder (#42471869) Attached to: Turkish Registrar Enabled Phishing Attacks Against Google
A certificate can (obviously) only have one issuer.
What he's suggesting is having multiple certificates corresponding to one private key.

This seems like an eminently sensible idea. Part of the problem is that the Certifying Authorities get "too big to fail" and it takes something pretty massive for a CA to have their authority revoked as doing so impacts a lot of users.

If sites (at least those interested enough in HA to preemptively guard against the invalidation of a CA) could back their keys with multiple certs that would be very useful.

"There are some good people in it, but the orchestra as a whole is equivalent to a gang bent on destruction." -- John Cage, composer

Working...