Forgot your password?

typodupeerror

Comment: Re:Suits, obviously (Score 1) 157

by Chmcginn (#36392462) Attached to: The Ongoing Case of Rakofsky vs. Internet

The current situation in the UK was on my mind when reading up on this case. It seems like, at least currently, in the US defamation and libel suits have a hard time proceeding except when it's incredibly blatant, or when the plaintiff has far more in the way of resources than the defendant. Having done a bit of business in the UK, and having a few relatives who've done a lot more, I've been getting the feeling that media there would be scared to do a lot of the things that media in the US currently takes for granted.

The Onggoing Case of Rakofsky vs. Internet->

Submitted by Chmcginn
Chmcginn writes "Joseph Rakofsky, a New Jersey lawyer whose claim to internet fame is filing a lawsuit against the Washington Post and the American Bar Association for criticizing his performance at a Washington, DC, murder trial, has amended his suit to include a number of bloggers and internet forum members — for criticizing the lawsuit. Which is a bigger threat to free speech — direct government action, or fear of lawsuits for frivolous defamation charges?"
Link to Original Source

Comment: Re:CQ? (Score 1) 840

by Chmcginn (#35031176) Attached to: Egypt Shuts Off All Internet Access

Most countries have facilities in place to receive/record and triangulate most of all the signals passing through the air. It's pretty basic really.

And unless they're transmitting from the middle of nowhere, it's extremely hard to get a narrow enough search area to find one person with a radio setup that might be quite small. You might know that they're in a particular apartment complex, but without searching room-by-room, DF systems aren't good enough to get an exact location.

Even in the US, it takes quite a bit of effort (and some luck) to find people using a radio improperly. When I lived in Maryland, there was a guy who made fake distress calls via his marine radio on several weekends in a row. The state police & USCG narrowed the search area down to a fairly small area, but since it was in the middle of a marina, they couldn't determine which boat it was coming from. (He eventually got caught when someone who had been on the pier at the marina overhead him making the transmission.)

Comment: Re:Where are those who dubbed wikileaks 'terrorist (Score 2) 410

by Chmcginn (#34544508) Attached to: EPA Knowingly Allowed Pesticide That Kills Bees

Actually large-scale farms which want everything pollinated and thus ready for harvest in one go purchase the services of large-scale beekeepers, which drive farmed bees to the area in hive trucks and leave them there while they pollinate. By the time they die off it's mission accomplished, and growing bees artificially wherever you want isn't under threat like the naturally occurring bees that pollinate wild flowers.

Except that it's the colonies used by commercial beekeepers that are among the hardest-hit by CCD, and their replenishment programs can't keep up with the loss. If a cure for CCD can't be found, in a few years the supply of hives will be lower than the demand for pollination services.

FLASH! Intelligence of mankind decreasing. Details at ... uh, when the little hand is on the ....

Working...