Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!


Forgot your password?
Slashdot Deals: Deal of the Day - 6 month subscription of Pandora One at 46% off. ×

Comment Re: More by whom (Score 1) 368

That's only true when you're talking about firing straight up. At lower angles a bullet can go in an arc and still have a significant amount of lateral velocity when I comes down because gravity only acts in the vertical direction. It will still be slowed down somewhat by air resistance but that's not necessarily enough to make it non-lethal (if bullets couldn't overcome air resistance then guns would be useless in an atmosphere).

Comment Re:Final Tally (Score 1) 316

You seem to have forgotten the Atlas V and Delta IV.

Atlas V had a "partial failure" where the second stage cut off 4 seconds early in a 900 second burn; but even the customer (NRO) still called it a success. If Falcon 9's aborted secondary payload doesn't count as a failure then I can hardly see how Atlas' slightly lower orbit does, which means it's at 54 successful launches and counting.

Delta IV-M on the other hand has never had even a partial failure, 21 launches going. The Delta IV-H had one partial failure but that's a rather different animal.

Also neither vehicle has ever had a total failure.

Comment Re:Fiction. (Score 1) 419

Well yea, recruiting is the entire reason for the existence of AA, nobody disputes that. The GPP however was insinuating that the only reason (or at least one of the main reasons) war FPS games in general exist is because the DoD funds them. That's silly, franchises like CoD and BF make money hand over fist, there's no reason for the DoD to bribe someone to make them.

Comment Re:Fiction. (Score 1) 419

Defense now throws millions of dollars at game developers, tasking them with making war look like just another extreme sport.

Yea I don't suppose you have a citation on that one? Closest I've heard of is the America's Army series, and they're pretty open about that being a recruiting/education tool.

Comment Re: Just because... (Score 1) 333

I'm not sure how useful that would be in practice though. The only "aborts" after t-0 that I've ever heard of were due to either A) the rocket blew up or B) loss of control of the rocket resulted in it straying off course and then being blown up by range safety. Either scenarios preclude any attempt at landing (you either have no rocket or no control of the rocket). Is there any other reason a mission would be aborted post-launch? Even with human cargo I'd think you'd jettison the capsule if things were bad enough that you had to abort.

A failure will not appear until a unit has passed final inspection.