Follow Slashdot stories on Twitter


Forgot your password?
For the out-of-band Slashdot experience (mostly headlines), follow us on Twitter, or Facebook. ×

Comment: Re:She has a point. (Score 1) 628 628

So what? Just like it's not the role of the school to fix your attitudes towards sexuality it's not the role of the CS class to "fix" theirs.

No one brought 'sexuality' into the classroom. It's a picture of a face.

And it's very disingenuous to say it's just a picture of a face, kids aren't morons, someone will figure out the source and spread the news.

Then that's their problem. It's still just a picture of a face.

And even as just a face it's very obviously a sexualized picture.

I'm being trolled here, aren't I?

What are you, some sort of weird face fetishist?

Comment: Re:She has a point. (Score 4, Insightful) 628 628

And yes, using an image you know many students will find offensive or threatening just because you think they should feel otherwise is preaching.

If someone finds a picture of a face offensive or threatening, then they've got problems no amount of preaching is going to fix.

Comment: Re:The FAA Tried to Study This (Score 1) 36 36

I don't know why the controllers union would be against it.

Because they're dumb and shortsighted. It was obvious to us that it would mean more controllers being hired (and, even better, controllers that could live where it was cheap and the weather was nice, due to remote capabilities). However, the study included a concept for a fully automated control system for airports that don't see enough traffic to even warrant remote tower control, which would interact with aircraft over the radio (kind of like how unattended runway lights are triggered by keying your mic on the right frequency). In addition, only the big airports are staffed by FAA controllers. The small towers are run by (non-unionized) contractors.

As soon as any discussion of some sort of control system that didn't involve warm bodies, or possibly increasing the number of non-union controllers came up, they torpedoed it.

Comment: Re:Technology allows (Score 4, Insightful) 636 636

Actually you seem to be missing the obvious: Improving the standard of living of everyone will solve the population growth problem for us. The only countries where the population is still growing like crazy are where the vast majority of citizens are poor and uneducated. Once people get a little bit of education and the ability to enjoy leisure time, they funnily enough stop having kids.

Comment: Re:Translation ... (Score 2) 392 392

It's suprisingly more common than you would think. Really depends on the state. They'd be strung up in the northeast for sure, but 'Castle Doctrine' states are usually a little bit more reasonable about giving leeway to people in their home when armed men kick in the doors.

Comment: Re: 5th Edition kind of sucks (Score 1) 59 59

Crafting has always been unimportant to the games of most people, who would rather splatter some goblin brains than make some arrowheads or trade in exotic spices.

Considering the intricately detailed magic item creation rules in the 3rd edition derived games, I have to disagree with you. There's obviously a market for it, as Pathfinder spent a lot of effort on refining the existing mechanics.

And I said metallic dragons. Chromatic dragons were in the 4e Monster Manual. And that was exactly the problem: The book only had things for you to fight, and only the details you needed to fight them.

"Even if you're on the right track, you'll get run over if you just sit there." -- Will Rogers