Slashdot is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop


Forgot your password?

Slashdot videos: Now with more Slashdot!

  • View

  • Discuss

  • Share

We've improved Slashdot's video section; now you can view our video interviews, product close-ups and site visits with all the usual Slashdot options to comment, share, etc. No more walled garden! It's a work in progress -- we hope you'll check it out (Learn more about the recent updates).


Chacham's Journal: Book: Raymond Smullyan's books are silly.

Journal by Chacham

So, as if the blackout is still going on, i'm reading a book. "What is the name of this book?". Borrowed from a friend who bought it for about three dollars. I have another book from the same author, overall the books are interesting, but stupid. In some puzzles you just have to know what *he* is thinking. As a cute example, he asks the age-old question: "100 yards south of a bear, walk 100 yards east, turn north, and shoot, hit the bear. Where are you?" He quotes the North Pole answers, but then says techincally, it can also be an area noth of the South Pole where the circumference around the pole is 100 yards (or 50, or 100/3, etc.). Good catch, but then adds that one must assume that a brown bear was not transported there. Ah, so he's techincal.

Then he gets in with a train leaving New York for Boston, and an hour later a train leaves Boston for New York. Which is closer to Boston when they meet. He says they are equal. He's incorrect though. One train is always closer. Why? Because when they meet, they are head to head. If the New York train is not yet in the Boston station, the tail of the Boston train will be closer to Boston. And, if the New York train could make it to Boston in that hour, and the train that was leaving Boston started elsewhere, (and the station was on the edge of town, with the head on the train exactly on or past the border) when the met the New York train would be closer. The second one is a stretch, but, technically, he was incorrect.

Here's another example of sillyness, two men stand for trial, the jury finds one guilty of murder, and the other not guilty, ther judge cannot sentence the person, why?" The answer is they are siamese twins. Seriously silly. Then the midget in the elevator question, the book would seem almost as stupid as MENSA's puzzle books.

However, given the variety, the books seems worth a longer read. And, even when he's incorrect, the question can be interesting. The next JE should mention one.

This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Book: Raymond Smullyan's books are silly.

Comments Filter:

Brain off-line, please wait.