Forgot your password?

typodupeerror

Comment: Re:They don't care. (Score 4, Interesting) 109

The problem with that is that they can "presume" all they want, but they still have less money coming in. Granted, it doesn't address the aforementioned issue of needing a critical mass of participants for the boycott to be successful, but the mere act of assuming a given cause for a reduced revenue stream doesn't magically restore the revenue stream to previous levels.

Comment: Re:Nice Try China! (Score 3, Informative) 282

by CelticWhisper (#43198093) Attached to: Ask Slashdot: Best Way To Block Web Content?

Adblock used to have an option to do just that. It disappeared many versions ago.

Pity, because it was a good idea if you really wanted to stick it to the advertisers. You'd lose the bandwidth savings as the ad content would still download, but if you're unmetered and sporting a vendetta against marketroids it was a great option to use.

Comment: Re:Xanax (Score 1) 303

by CelticWhisper (#43141203) Attached to: I most look forward to flying with ...

Too bad for them. I'm on the Autism spectrum and while I function adequately in my day-to-day life (more often than not, anyway), --I-- don't take kindly to situations where a complete stranger has total control over whether or not another complete stranger can touch me without my consent.

They get semi-unconscious me or nervous-wreck-meltdown me. Their call, but I recommend the former.

Comment: Re:I don't understand the "high cap" magazine ban (Score 1) 1862

by CelticWhisper (#42593667) Attached to: 3D Printable Ammo Clip Skirts New Proposed Gun Laws

I'm not certain that the rationale is bullshit. It worked once, so it's at least logically sound. I think the problem is more a matter of A. imbalance in power between the citizenry and the authorities and B. the willingness, or lack thereof, of the populace to mobilize against an oppressive government. It doesn't help that companies designing and building passive protective gear (i.e. nothing that can do harm, only protect against it) like THOR Shield are only selling to law-enforcement and thus further contributing to that imbalance.

You make a good point, though, about Occupy. I think it'd be great if a company (Something like ProtesTek Inc. or some other such name) started designing lightweight protective gear for protestors to wear, with metallic lining that protects against TASERs (and possibly millimeter-wave ADS weapons), headgear that's hardened against batons and has ear protection to neutralize LRADs, built in squirt bottles for the Maalox-water solution to neutralize pepper spray and, uh, integrated waste collection (a la Fremen stillsuits) and maybe cellular communications in case of kettling. Sure it'd cost a fortune, but something like that would arguably be better than an armed uprising as it would force authorities to level with the people once their fancy tech-tricks aren't effective anymore.

Comment: Re:In Illinois? (Score 3, Informative) 225

by CelticWhisper (#42097767) Attached to: Supreme Court Blocks Illinois Law Against Recording Police

They exist. Qik, UStream, and TapIn are among them. TapIn in particular was designed for protestors and recording authorities, and provides no means to delete footage on the recording device itself - it must be done from the user's account page, by which time the video will have been downloaded and redistributed beyond the user's (or the police's) ability to control.

Comment: Re:Because you brought it up... (Score 1) 926

Problem is that Jesusland states in the Deep South have more to worry about from some oceanborn disaster than residents of northern blue states like Illinois or Wisconsin. Geologically speaking, the "liberal north" is closer to the center of the North American landmass than the "god-fearing south" is - especially when compared to Texas, Louisiana and the FL panhandle.

Comment: Remote deletion (Score 5, Interesting) 309

by CelticWhisper (#41178485) Attached to: Kindle Fire Is Sold Out Forever

I'll consider the KF2 if Amazon can prove they've permanently removed the ability to remotely delete files from it. No "Sorry (that we got caught)," no "We really truly promise, cross our hearts and hope to die, that we won't use this remote-kill feature which we've conveniently left fully intact and operational on our store servers." I'm not settling for anything less than "We're sorry we fucked with your property, we were wrong to do it irrespective of any licensing disputes, and we've irreversibly crippled our own ability to ever do it again. Here's proof and here's the list of files to rename or delete on your own device to make sure that even if we change our minds, we won't be able to do it to you ever again." Otherwise, I'll keep steering people toward Nook, BeBook, Onyxbook, Kobo, and other brands. Except Sony, of course.

I'm unwilling to buy a device that I end up not truly owning and controlling. I consider the lack of WLAN connectivity on my BeBook to be a feature after what Amazon pulled with 1984.

Books

+ - Will Your Books and Music Die With You?

Submitted by theodp
theodp writes "Many of us will accumulate vast libraries of digital books and music over the course of our lifetimes, reports the WSJ, but when we die, our collections of words and music may expire with us. 'I find it hard to imagine a situation where a family would be OK with losing a collection of 10,000 books and songs,' says author Evan Carroll of the problems created for one's heirs with digital content, which doesn’t convey the same ownership rights as print books and CDs. So what's the solution? Amazon and Apple were mum when contacted, but with the growth of digital assets, Dazza Greenwood of MIT's Media Lab said it's time to reform and update IP law so content can be transferred to another’s account or divided between several people."

Old timer, n.: One who remembers when charity was a virtue and not an organization.

Working...