Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!


Forgot your password?
Slashdot Deals: Cyber Monday Sale Extended! Courses ranging from coding to project management - all eLearning deals 20% off with coupon code "CYBERMONDAY20". ×

Submission + - Peer Review Highly Sensitive To Poor Refereeing (physicsworld.com)

$RANDOMLUSER writes: A new study described at physicsworld.com claims that a small percentage of shoddy or self-interested referees can have a drastic effect on published article quality. The research shows that article quality can drop as much as one standard deviation when just 10% of referees do not behave "correctly". At high levels of rational or random behavior, "the peer-review system will not perform much better than by accepting papers by throwing (an unbiased) coin". The model also includes calculations for "friendship networks" (nepotism) between authors and reviewers.
The original paper, by a pair of complex systems researchers, is at arXiv.org. No word on when we can expect it to be peer reviewed.

Artificial intelligence has the same relation to intelligence as artificial flowers have to flowers. -- David Parnas