Follow Slashdot blog updates by subscribing to our blog RSS feed


Forgot your password?
Take advantage of Black Friday with 15% off sitewide with coupon code "BLACKFRIDAY" on Slashdot Deals (some exclusions apply)". ×

Comment Re:Money (Score 1) 758

.NET almost certainly requires a lot of licensing that you normally would not be paying (ignoring Mono). Using .NET requires Windows licenses for development and production (and everything in between). It probably requires a SQL Server license . Most shops that I am aware of that do development on windows also subscribe all devs to MSDN (not cheap!).

  MS has bid on a few of my projects. They never include all the required software and CALs required because they assume you are a MS shop. Oh, you don't have windows? You don't have BizTalk? You don't have SQL Server? You don't have sharepoint? No MSDN? Let's just say they've never won a bid even though I'm open minded enough to include them. These license costs add up very very quickly and they don't go away, they just get worse as you get more locked in.

Comment Re:Article is trollbait (Score 3, Insightful) 405

> Switch to OpenSolaris

No, just no, not unless you have a specific reason to. As a desktop? They don't call it Slowaris for nothing, y'know.

Way to keep the troll alive. I know you are just trying to get a rise out of people, but come on, digging up a term from like 1995 isn't very convincing. I personally run Solaris (and production systems at work) because there is nothing in the space that scales like it. Even for single thread applications (and only one of them) with no memory requirements it is just as fast (now at least, early x86 versions of Solaris didn't perform as well as their SPARC counterparts) as FreeBSD, Linux, Windows, etc.

I could go on to bash Linux et al but, but what would be the point? What ever suits your needs the best is the best OS. Oh, I remember, this is slashdot, we make uninformed, brash comments here now. In 2000, this was a forum for killing FUD, now it is hear to spread FUD.

To the original poster, I think, if you want a better debate, you should take it to

Comment Re:Does that mean... (Score 1) 386

Additionally there isn't really much likelihood of that happening considering that ZFS isn't really supposed to be used outside of a ZMIRROR or RAIDZ environment.

This requires a citation.

And why not? ZFS is still great in single disk setups. It will tell you when you data is corrupt way more reliably than older filesystems. It just won't auto-correct it because thare are only check sums, not parity for those blocks. It still is way more robust and resistant to corruption that older file-systems. It's easier to manage ... blah blah blah. Oh yeah, if I set copies=2 or 3 or 4 or 5 I CAN indeed automatically repair corruption due to sector failures,etc just like in a multi disk setup. I can also tell it to make multiple copies of the meta data on a single disk.

Comment Re:Stay classy (Score 2, Insightful) 290

The only one that didn't want Palm products to succeed was Palm. Horrible products. Support EOL for all their products were the day they shipped. Rarely got any sort of bug fixes, never any additional features. Palm Desktop for Mac is still a PowerPC only application (runs on intel via rosetta). Why bother trying to support something the vendor has no interest in supporting? I'll never make the mistake of buying another Palm product (I've had 2, Palm Pro and Palm T5). I've never heard anyone say a good thing about their Treo so I never went there. I don't expect anything will change with the Pre. I also don't understand the Pre hype, it's not bringing anything new to the table.

Comment Re:Should have used PHP. (Score 1) 324

Please mod this post up. PHP is ridiculously bad. When you build things with a huge committee you are likely to get something bad, when you build something with a huge committee of people that have never programmed before, only edited someone's perl CGI, you get PHP.

Comment Re:Should have used PHP. (Score 2, Interesting) 324

Huh? Are you confused? Both companies made the stupid mistake of using a web scripting language to do backend heavy lifting. Twitter is fixing that with Scala. (leaving RoR on the frontend because its really good at web frontends) Facebook already fixed that with ERLANG, not PHP. (leaving PHP on the frontend because of the technical debt they've accumulated) BTW, PHP is the worst language ever. That is a fact, not my opinion.

"Spock, did you see the looks on their faces?" "Yes, Captain, a sort of vacant contentment."