+1 I don't think this person is looking for a college education, I suggest they seek out a vocational school. This will be funny when a google search before a job interview pulls up this post. I don't hire engineers that aren't interested in learning.
Slashdot videos: Now with more Slashdot!
We've improved Slashdot's video section; now you can view our video interviews, product close-ups and site visits with all the usual Slashdot options to comment, share, etc. No more walled garden! It's a work in progress -- we hope you'll check it out (Learn more about the recent updates).
.NET almost certainly requires a lot of licensing that you normally would not be paying (ignoring Mono). Using
MS has bid on a few of my projects. They never include all the required software and CALs required because they assume you are a MS shop. Oh, you don't have windows? You don't have BizTalk? You don't have SQL Server? You don't have sharepoint? No MSDN? Let's just say they've never won a bid even though I'm open minded enough to include them. These license costs add up very very quickly and they don't go away, they just get worse as you get more locked in.
It killed the consumer GPS market and it will kill the consumer digicam market too. It hasn't and won't touch pro-sumer let alone pro GPS/camera markets. "Phones" are becoming the jack of all trades, master of none.
> Switch to OpenSolaris
No, just no, not unless you have a specific reason to. As a desktop? They don't call it Slowaris for nothing, y'know.
Way to keep the troll alive. I know you are just trying to get a rise out of people, but come on, digging up a term from like 1995 isn't very convincing. I personally run Solaris (and production systems at work) because there is nothing in the space that scales like it. Even for single thread applications (and only one of them) with no memory requirements it is just as fast (now at least, early x86 versions of Solaris didn't perform as well as their SPARC counterparts) as FreeBSD, Linux, Windows, etc.
I could go on to bash Linux et al but, but what would be the point? What ever suits your needs the best is the best OS. Oh, I remember, this is slashdot, we make uninformed, brash comments here now. In 2000, this was a forum for killing FUD, now it is hear to spread FUD.
To the original poster, I think, if you want a better debate, you should take it to serverfault.com
Additionally there isn't really much likelihood of that happening considering that ZFS isn't really supposed to be used outside of a ZMIRROR or RAIDZ environment.
This requires a citation.
And why not? ZFS is still great in single disk setups. It will tell you when you data is corrupt way more reliably than older filesystems. It just won't auto-correct it because thare are only check sums, not parity for those blocks. It still is way more robust and resistant to corruption that older file-systems. It's easier to manage
That is covered very clearly in the blog article referenced from the Register article. http://blogs.sun.com/bonwick/en_US/entry/zfs_dedup
The only one that didn't want Palm products to succeed was Palm. Horrible products. Support EOL for all their products were the day they shipped. Rarely got any sort of bug fixes, never any additional features. Palm Desktop for Mac is still a PowerPC only application (runs on intel via rosetta). Why bother trying to support something the vendor has no interest in supporting? I'll never make the mistake of buying another Palm product (I've had 2, Palm Pro and Palm T5). I've never heard anyone say a good thing about their Treo so I never went there. I don't expect anything will change with the Pre. I also don't understand the Pre hype, it's not bringing anything new to the table.
Ah, I love PHP. Oh wait, that's not love... that's hate, disdain and frustration.