Forgot your password?

typodupeerror

Comment: Re:Why the difference (Score 1) 121

by BitterOak (#40133069) Attached to: New Cyberbullying Evidence Rules May Go Too Far

Punching someone in the stomach is assault, not bullying, and I assume that they already have laws for that.

Actually bullying and assault are the same thing. What I object to most about all this cyber-bullying nonsense is the attempt to redefine the word "bullying" to include insults as well. Back when I went to school, bullies were students who beat up other students. People who shouted insults were known as jerks.

Comment: Re:When Zuckie himself is selling shares (Score 1) 262

by BitterOak (#40093849) Attached to: SEC Calls For Review of Facebook IPO

Why would u buy?

Zuckerberg is pretty much forced to sell his shares in order to pay his income taxes. He doesn't actually have a whole lot of cash; his wealth is in his shares of Facebook. But after the IPO, the value of all those shares is taxable income, so he has no choice but to sell shares. If he waits until tax time to sell them, and if the value has fallen enough, he might not have enough money to pay his taxes at all, which would put him in a very awkward position.

Comment: Re:And this is a success? (Score 1) 76

by BitterOak (#40093805) Attached to: Machine-Guided Learning Matches Teachers In Study

I can't believe how low the teaching level must've got if a machine receives better outcomes than a teacher. Or how low the assessment of learning...

Did you say the same thing about human chess players when computers started beating the world champions? Maybe it isn't that teachers have gotten worse, but that computers and instructional software have gotten better.

Comment: Re:Lawsuits for everyone. (Score 1, Troll) 92

by BitterOak (#40046837) Attached to: Facebook Privacy Suit Seeks $15 Billion

Even if you don't sign up to Facebook, they are tracking you because of their little F icon and/or scripts/cookies are being loaded up by your web browser on any webpage you are visiting.

Nobody says you have to click the little F icon!

Really. Facebook is offering a free service here. No one is forcing you to sign up, and even if you do sign up, no one is forcing you to reveal personal details. If they can be charged under the federal wiretap statute, then really no website that uses cookies is safe. The best solution is just to not use Facebook, rather than ask the government to twist the law to fit what Facebook is doing.

Comment: Re:You CAN turn off your phone. (Score 1) 147

I don't think I should have to disable my phone to prevent the authorities from high jacking it. After all I paid for the phone and I'm a citizen not a subject. If they can convince a judge they can get a warrant, otherwise hands off.

The advantage to taking out the battery, especially when doing something private, is it protects you even when the police DO have a warrant!

Comment: You CAN turn off your phone. (Score 3, Insightful) 147

Unlike GPS devices covertly installed on your vehicle by police, cell phones are in the user's control. You don't have to leave it turned on all the time. In particular, if you are doing something private, like visiting your mistress, you can simply turn the phone off before driving to her apartment. And if you're afraid the phone will still leak location information while in standby or power-off mode, you can simply remove the battery.

Murray's Rule: Any country with "democratic" in the title isn't.

Working...