Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment: Re:Corporations are not people (Score 5, Insightful) 139

Most of this happened longer than 5 years ago under different leadership. HP is still suffering from the mistakes of the past. HP was financially successful then but at a cost. This is the way people like Mark Hurd do business. Its all about short term gains. Being told your pay was being cut because of difficult times and it was necessary in order to survive, only to find out that 6 months later HP had record profits. That's why all the top performer's no longer work there.

Comment: Its fun (Score 2) 308

by BurfCurse (#45748535) Attached to: Ask Slashdot: Do You Run a Copy-Cat Installation At Home?
I do the same and I consider it fun. I guess that's why I like what I do. Does it benefit my employer? Well certainly, but it benefits me too in terms of job performance, confidence, and job satisfaction. I tinker with things that I think are fun. The experience that you gain will take your career in that direction.

Comment: Re:Look at it from a dev's perspective. (Score 1) 324

by BurfCurse (#45681699) Attached to: Google Cuts Android Privacy Feature, Says Release Was Unintentional
That's exactly what I proposed. But can you selectively reject any permission on an IOS app? I honestly don't know. Its a pain in the ass for an internet browser app to have to handle the case where the user has rejected internet access to the app. That's something that should be opted into before installing the app. If the user doesn't trust the app, they can install something else.

Comment: Look at it from a dev's perspective. (Score 1) 324

by BurfCurse (#45679823) Attached to: Google Cuts Android Privacy Feature, Says Release Was Unintentional
It would be great for an App maker to be able to selectively ask for permissions from a user. But letting the user pick and choose what permissions they want ANY app to have creates a giant headache for app makers. Think about all of the permutations you have to test for if a user selectively grants permissions. Think about the intelligence of half the people who use smart phones. A user disables a critical permission, app fails to function, and user rates the app 1 star. And don't tell me its the dumb user's fault, cause you know the app maker is going to have to deal with it regardless.

Comment: Re:Can I form a LLC and commit crimes? (Score 1) 119

by BurfCurse (#45227903) Attached to: Rental Business Aaron's Admits Role In Spying On Customers
Ok, so extend it to small business. Small landscaping company owner. One of his employees starts stealing from the property owners. Should the owner be liable for the loss? Absolutely. Should he be sent to jail? Absolutely not. What would be the point? He's not a criminal. This is a slippery slope, one that leads society into constant fear, with everyone assuming unavoidable liability.

Comment: Re:Can I form a LLC and commit crimes? (Score 1) 119

by BurfCurse (#45225557) Attached to: Rental Business Aaron's Admits Role In Spying On Customers
I hear people say the exact same thing all the time and it scares me that people believe this. Do you really want to live in a society where you can be thrown in jail because someone, that you have limited control over, does something illegal without your knowledge? Yes, as a CEO you have a responsibility to know what your company is doing, but anyone who has ever worked for a large company knows the CEO has very little visibility into what most of a company's individual parts are doing, other than what his/her direct reports tell them.

Comment: Re:For a field that is compartmentalized... (Score 1) 491

Even mildly sensitive phonecalls do not get made anywhere near a window and anything down to mundane items like laser printers and photocopiers are either imported from a secure source or if they are bought locally they are examined back to front to make sure they haven't been interfered with.

Given what we know about the US government, I think I'd have more faith in a laser printer bought from Walmart than one imported from a "secure" source.

Comment: Re:*Shudder* (Score 1) 91

by BurfCurse (#43900501) Attached to: Book Review: Creating Mobile Apps With JQuery Mobile
"If your site doesn't work with JavaScript disabled, then it's a bad site" No its not. Its just a site that has accepted that it may have alienated a certain percentage of potential users. For many websites, that percentage of their customer base can be extremely small and have decided a degraded experience isn't worth it. The rest potentially benefit from a better user experience.

Comment: Re:But that's not the real problem. (Score 1) 1651

by BurfCurse (#41527905) Attached to: To Encourage Biking, Lose the Helmets
Fair enough. I agree there are numerous cyclists that don't follow the rules of the road. There are still a lot of people that do. I hope you aren't blowing smoke in their faces. I bet if you sat down and had a beer with us after our group ride you would find out that we aren't much different than you.

The moon may be smaller than Earth, but it's further away.

Working...