Catch up on stories from the past week (and beyond) at the Slashdot story archive

typodupeerror

# Slashdot videos: Now with more Slashdot!

• View

• Discuss

• Share

We've improved Slashdot's video section; now you can view our video interviews, product close-ups and site visits with all the usual Slashdot options to comment, share, etc. No more walled garden! It's a work in progress -- we hope you'll check it out (Learn more about the recent updates).

×

## Comment: Re:Oscillation and the conservation of energy? (Score 1)191

by Brett Viren (#32416946) Attached to: Chameleon-Like Behavior of Neutrino Confirmed

> 1. If an electron neutrino can spontaneously transform to a tau neutrino with higher mass, where exactly does the required energy come from? Alternatively, when a tau neutrino transforms to an electron neutrino, where does the extra energy disappear?

It is not yet known which neutrino has the higher mass. Also, when we say electron-, muon- or tau-neutrino we are speaking of weak-eigenstates, something that is well defined at the point of interaction (only). These do not even have a definite mass (they are not mass eigenstates) although they do have a mass expectation value (average, expected mass). Instead they are a super-position of the 3 mass eigenstates. This superposition changes as the neutrino wave packet propagates. This is because each mass eigenstate propagates independently and since energy must must be conserved, each mass eigenstate will travel at different speeds. This propagation then leads to oscillations, or the mixing of weak eigenstates. If the neutrino wave package is detected later, one may see an outgoing electron, muon or tau even if one starts, in the case of OPERA, with a muon-neutrino (and the neutrino energy is at least high enough to produce the outgoing lepton mass).

> 2. If neutrinos have mass, then they are restricted to speeds below c. If they are accelerated to near c, then according to the relativistic energy-momentum equations they should have colossal mass, not miniscule (just like electrons, for example). Is there any evidence of observing neutrinos with huge energies?

Well, particle masses do not change with speed. One can couch relativistic equations into an effective mass, which does increase with speed. But, in any case, only (rest) mass differences matter in neutrino oscillations (differences of squares of masses, actually).

Experiments like IceCube look for and see incredibly and not fully explainable high energy neutrino interactions.

## Comment: Re:Robust result? (Score 1)191

by Brett Viren (#32416830) Attached to: Chameleon-Like Behavior of Neutrino Confirmed

Your questions are not well addressed by the press release. There are two items that are missing: There are no tau neutrinos in the beam to begin with so any that are found are best explained by oscillation. The signature for a tau neutrino interaction, in this case, is a "kink" in the track produced from the outgoing tau traveling for some distance and then decaying to a muon. This signature reduces the background to negligent levels. And, yes, if background is small enough then even a single event is statistically significant.

## Comment: Re:I thought -I- was a nerd.... (Score 1)191

by Brett Viren (#32416788) Attached to: Chameleon-Like Behavior of Neutrino Confirmed

Because it confirms part of our understanding of our universe. What more is there?

## Comment: This submission's links. (Score 1)655

by Brett Viren (#28082741) Attached to: Ridiculous Software Bug Workarounds?

Most recently: Having to click on the comments link instead of the "Read more..." as the latter took me to a blank page.

In general there have been several times where I had to actually edit someones source code and recompile to work around some bug. Unbelievable!

If you can't understand it, it is intuitively obvious.

Working...