Someone needs more coffee so they can post coherently. Username status: Still Valid.
Reading comprehension would not lead me to the same place you have gone. When I read his comment there is no indication of what would happen after he receives a decent answer. This is not a low-bar barrier-to-entry, this is a "get the people wasting my time out of my office as quick as possible" barrier to entry. I would assume, though there was no indication either way, that this person would have more in his interview than this question.
You are acting like they will only make one calculation and go with it. You keep talking about this 21%, when the accuracy measurements, (until they find a way to make it more accurate) would require confidence testing on the numbers before input into as an answer into your program. Not that I think they'll be happy with doing it that way. But for now, it'll give you the accuracy necessary to get the job done right.
I've been watching the episode on that site since shortly after it came out. Great stuff.
I think the gp was talking about the guy going 59.5 passing the guy going 59.
I hate that too.
Bonus captcha: leeway
jamhigh is right. And 2short is right also.
"He's right? AND He's right?-How can they both be right?" you say?
"You know, you are also right."
As for WOW, bugger subscriptions, they are just too annoying, you know, oh no, I must play because I am paying for it and it will run out and I will lose my stuff unless I continue to pay and play, really steals your choice of whether to play or not.
This is uninformed. You don't lose stuff even if you cancel your subscription and come back later.
Only for those that can't follow a reasonably worded post.
You know, I'd have supported your position if you hadn't "fixed" the first line. I don't steal content but I do use file-sharing services to pick up things that would normally be free because the bit torrent and similar download algorithms make for a much faster download than one would get through normal methods.
I don't think he was fighting you on the main portion of your argument, but rather pointing out that losing the ability to drive is not comparable in any way to losing your internet access with this company. Mainly for the reason that you have to be proven incapable of driving well as opposed to getting disconnected based on circumstantial evidence or hearsay alone.
Except that this section of TFA invalidates your claim of bad summary: "Some customers have had their accounts suspended for more than two years." That was in the second 'paragraph'.
No kidding. Not to mention those drafts won't hold up to legal scrutiny.
I seem to daydream and experience flow (being in the zone) at the same time. Which I can't seem to understand. Shouldn't these be mutually exclusive?
Any psychologists out there have an answer for this?
*cries* All of them!!
Good ideas *can* come from anywhere. The power to implement them comes from those above. Y'know those with the influence or money to bring these ideas about.
This is a pretty simple concept:
Failure of the country != failure of the individual.