in the dark?
That's my guess.
And the US officially uses SI/Metric anyhow. We just use Imperial measure as well. And those units are still understood and used by people in Canada and the UK -- probably other places as well. The little stripes that tell how tall someone is when walking out of a bank or convenience store in Canada measure in feet and inches, not centimeters. At the folk level, these are the units that have been used for a whole lot longer than meters, and will continue to be understood by anybody who has ever read a book/song/poem/play/film that talked about miles, gallons, quarts, cups, pounds, etc. Those references happen with surprising frequency, and I've not seen a Canadian (in particular) ever ask for help converting a reference from those units because they didn't get the reference. And do you ever hear the cry in a pub in London for someone to come over and have 500 ml, or are the offered a pint?
I like SI/Metric, and am relatively conversant in it. It's great for technical uses for all of the reasons everybody has already mentioned. Base 10 measures are great in a base 10 number system. But base 2 measures aren't that hard to deal with, either. 8 oz in a cup, 2 cups in a pint, 2 pints in a quart, 4 quarts in a gallon -- not that hard. Pretty life-sized stuff, really.
It's a lot more than one -- a few dozen, more like. I mean, I get your point, that it's only a point or two of karma for any one comment, but enough is more than enough here. "Redundant" is for when people keep posting the same point when the point has already been made, but nobody saw the point being made. The system messed up. Good-faith comments don't need to be punished.
There was something wrong with the comments last night, and all the people posting the Immaculate Conception != Parthenogenesis things didn't see each other's comments. They don't need the karma hits of all of these Redundant mods.
Immaculate Conception is a whole 'nother thing than parthenogenesis. Has everything to do with (not having) Original Sin, and nothing to do with the messiness of sex leading to conception.
Who could possibly argue with that?
How come nobody modded this up?
Huh? I wasn't aware that anyone outside the propaganda wing of the Kim Regime had any illusions about how sucky life is in the DPRK. Yes, it's possible that North Korea is uniquely dark at night for a populated country because everyone there turns out all their lights at night, unlike everyone else in the world who has ever had electricity. Perhaps they also, uniquely in the history of the world, grow abundant food, but choose not to eat it so they can starve to death in droves. But there would need to be some stated reasons why modern inmates of the DPRK behave so unlike any other people who have ever lived.
Prove? I'm not sure how one would prove such a thing, but it's pretty good evidence, at least. What would they be doing with their power if not use it to light up the darkness at night?
If you look at the satellite photo of the world at night (http://www.bertc.com/subfour/truth/night2.htm), it's quite easy to see North Korea -- it's the dark space just West of Japan, and north of the very bright lights of South Korea -- the DMZ is a visible line between light and darkness. Just one little spot of light in the whole country, and the rest is darkness.
The average North Korean doesn't have power, and isn't sure they'll have enough food to eat today.
"And I'm like, 'OMG! Becky's not even hot!'"
I was thinking "3D House of Pancakes." But, yeah.
Wow. Amazing ability to not get a joke. That could make you a barrel of fun at parties.
Oh, that was sarcasm -- don't really try it at parties. Or anywhere.
No shortage of love for Ozzies here. Just a little good-natured poke based on the same poke in the other direction and current events.
Thank God you got the convicts and we got the Puritans.
A system that prevents rapes, gang fights and drug dealing while providing education and therapy would be hugely labor intensive, and would consume a huge proportion of people of very high moral character available in society, if there was a way to reliably identify them, if you had an incentive for them to want to do this. It would explode the costs of staffing prisons by whole number factors, when the existing system costs more than states can afford. Most of that increase would go for your first three criteria -- stopping rapes, gang violence and drug trafficking.
And it would be of limited utility, even at that. There is no way it would pay for itself by rehabilitating so many more prisoners that their lack of recidivism and productivity in society would offset these increased costs. The current system has opportunities for rehabilitative services and education for those with an interest who are willing to buy in to the "straight world" paradigm. There might be some benefit to expanding those opportunities so they could reach more people, but it's really hard to say if that would prove cost-effective.
I see this a little different than most folks. I work with kids in the foster care system -- the toughest kids in the system, including sex offenders. Some of these kids have done time in kid-jail and kid-prison. Some of them have parents and family members who have done prison time. A frustrating number of them are almost certain to spend a decade or more of their adult lives in prison, because they're so abysmally unprepared to live in the straight world. And there's no tidy obvious solution to this. As much as the SOs get the societal hate, it's much more difficult working with BRS (Behavioral Rehabilitation Services), especially with adolescents. Many of these kids were born with developmental problems due to fetal exposure to alcohol, and there is no cure for that. They have full sized bodies, and may have intellectual ages approaching their physical ages (usually, not), but have the emotional control and self-discipline of someone half their physical ages (or less). Those who don't come from severely broken homes run by incompetent (at best) or abusive parents have deep mental and emotional problems that may respond to competent treatment, but don't go away ever. Many of them are aggressive and violent simply because it helps them avoid having to deal with those emotional issues, and because it helps them feel like they have a little power in a world that overwhelms them. No amount of treatment or education will enable a significant portion of them to be able to live independently, and there is no way in Hell they will ever be productive enough to cover the living cost of a normal person who doesn't need the services they will consume -- not a few of them are in this boat before they take their first breath. It's damn unfair and frustrating to look at every day, which combines with inadequate pay (even in a system so expensive we have to cut the costs to provide any help at all) to result in massive burn-out and turn-over in my field.
I get to see these kids bounce off the criminal justice system time and time again with nothing more than a wrist-slap until they've compiled a serious history of violence and a belief that the system will do nothing to them no matter what, which prevents them from learning how to cope with disappointment and frustration in constructive ways, because they can destroy things and assault people without losing anything they care about. When they become legal adults, and don't have the child welfare system in place to protect them and provide for them, and don't have the capability of finding and keeping a job that will give them a fraction of the lifestyle they've gotten used to, there is no real chance for them to survive outside of prison.
I think there is a portion of criminals for which these kinds of alternatives could be useful for -- not the people who are currently being sent to prison, but the kinds of people who are simply being released because there isn't room for them in prison. Work-release kinds of things. Those are fine for people developmentally, emotionally, dispositionally and educationally prepared to be gainfully employed. But most of the people in the prison system are not thus prepared to function in society (including my nephew, who will soon be beginning his second prison sentence shortly). Some of them will be willing to participate in drug treatment, vocational training, and psychiatric treatment to help them become thus prepared, but those are very, very hard things to do (talk with a recovering alcoholic/addict some time), and it's just easier to take a path of lower resistance and stay in the prison world instead.
It's obvious the system is broken. Broken badly. I think the rehabilitation/reform model developed during the Progressive Era has been proven an abject failure. Unfortunately, no workable alternative model has presented itself. Too many people aren't willing or able to work for their own support, or to follow rules that guarantee their safety and the safety of their communities. TFA doesn't present a system which could deal with enough prison-bound people to be interesting. This line of reasoning should be pursued, so that, some day, perhaps the tech will combine with some potential break-throughs and new models that could work better. It's not a bad effort. It just isn't ready to be what the author wants it to be.