Forgot your password?

typodupeerror

Comment: Re:ITT: (Score 1) 377

by Black Parrot (#43757609) Attached to: Review: <em>Star Trek: Into Darkness</em>

News flash: Star Trek was never as good as you remember. It was never about "ideas," it was never "sci fi" in the narrow definition presented above, it was never NOT a caricature, and the reason it was never "cool" is because it was a plodding, meandering mess with shitty dialogue and poor production values.

Not that I disagree with you, but since there is a very widespread ideal notion of what Star Trek was, it seems like someone would have the vision to try to make that ideal real.

But no, let's just take some generic Hollywood pablum, stick some names from a popular franchise on it so it will sell, and leave the thinking for someone else.

Comment: Re:Really? (Score 1) 377

by Black Parrot (#43757401) Attached to: Review: <em>Star Trek: Into Darkness</em>

You're trying to claim that the original StarTrek wasn't a chauvinistic, womanising series in which Uhura was portrayed as an independant woman?

If you're concerned with chauvinism, you should have noticed that ToS was a parable about an international crew under the benevolent command of an American captain, who occasionally had to yank the Russian's chain to keep him under control.

Comment: Re:One teensy detail (Score 4, Informative) 388

by Black Parrot (#43735735) Attached to: Why We Should Build a Supercomputer Replica of the Human Brain

Not to mention that we have no clear definition for bare intelligence as it stands. And this braggart thinks we can just hook up enough xboxes and away we go? Hah! Neuroscience isn't following his lead because he's uneducated.

Actually he's one of the world's leading computational neuroscientists, and he's not proposing to just hook a lot of computers together.

He's proposing to simulate the brain from the neuron level up. And he just won a billion-euro award to pursue that.

Comment: Re:timing? (Score 1) 195

by Black Parrot (#43726875) Attached to: Russia Captures Alleged American CIA Agent In Moscow

I don't doubt for a second that this was an American agent. But I would think in every situation there is a reason everything happens when it did. Why did the Russians nab him now. Why not keep him under surveillance let him reveal traitors to the FSB as they get recruited? They obviously were not all that serious or they wouldn't have promptly turned him back over to the US. So what is up?

When the article says "The incident comes amid a new chill in Russian-U.S. relations sparked by the Syrian crisis and concern in Washington over what it sees as President Vladimir Putin's crackdown on human rights.", it should probably say that it comes because of the chill.

See also, 'game'.

Comment: Re:Psychiatry created by Pharma (Score 1) 322

The entire field of Psychiatry was created by the pharmaceutical industry with the express purpose of selling more drugs.

Actually, psychiatry was created by people who wanted to explain everything as the consequence of feeling guilty about jacking off. The pharmaceuticals came along later.

And pace the whiners, drugs *do* help a lot of people. It's hit-and-miss, and not much more scientific than "let's try this and see if it works", but at least that's an approach based on evidence rather than theories about wanking off.

Also, we've made a *lot* of progress in finding effective drugs over the past decades. If you think our methods are sloppy now, turn back the clock 30, 40, or 50 years, and see how well we were treating mental problems then.

Hopefully someday we'll actually understand mental/brain disorders and know how (and whether) to treat them. But we're not there yet.

It took me fifteen years to discover that I had no talent for writing, but I couldn't give it up because by that time I was too famous. -- Robert Benchley

Working...