Possession of child pornography is illegal in itself. Given that how would they have the original image to match against?
Almost every child pornography possession statute that I've seen has an exception for law enforcement activities. For example, a jury examining photos in a jury room wouldn't be guilty of possession if those photos are evidence presented at trial.
But as soon as it starts blocking my picture of my dinner as kiddie porn, having Facebook and Twitter block it becomes fairly meaningless.
The question you need to ask yourself is "Why am I uploading pictures of my dinner?" Seriously. People do that all the time, and I have to wonder why. Does anyone really enjoy seeing other people's dinner? What's next? People posting pictures of their poop?
Your post is trying to insinuate that they were haggling for a price of the tissue, but no, it's the transport.
That's like the old CD and record clubs that sold albums at ridiculously low prices (a few dollars for CDs that would cost $15 or more in stores) but then they'd charge absolutely ridiculous "shipping and handling" fees that would bring prices much closer to retail. The shipping and handling would be many times what it would cost by first class postage, the bulk of it being (presumably) "handling" fees, i.e. their profit. It's the same thing here. They call it "transportation fees", but it's really just so they can sell it without selling it. Who haggles over shipping costs? That's set by UPS.
Zero-days are not "back doors".
Unless the zero day flaw was put there intentionally, as back doors are put there intentionally, a zero day flaw is not a back door, it's just some incompetent who should be employed asking me "Do you want fries with that?", rather than employed writing security sensitive software. In other words: your average bad programmer.
I think the implication of the story is that they are put in there intentionally, at least some of them.
Then I'll copy and paste the text to another Windows and foward it.
I would assume the copy and paste functions would be disabled, otherwise this would be pointless.
I care about none of those things. Youtube uses html 5 just fine.
How do you get to the HTML5 version of YouTube? Whenever I play a YouTube video, it uses Flash. I know this cause if I right click on a video a menu pops up and one of the options is "About Adobe Flash Player". Is there a different URL for the HTML5 site, or is there a settings menu somewhere where I can change it?
I don't believe someone needs to die to warrant a bigger sentence. The fact is, this psychopath put many people in harms way and got their doors broken down and live guns pointed at them. The fact that nobody died is a miracle
If the Swat team response to an unverified phone call is to put people's lives at such severe risk as you describe, the problem is with the police, not the teenage idiot who placed the fake calls.
Formatting what appears to be a list into one single paragraph makes it awkward to decipher.
Maybe it's a sparse list.
"The hottest places in Hell are reserved for those who, in times of moral crisis, preserved their neutrality." -- Dante