Slashdot stories can be listened to in audio form via an RSS feed, as read by our own robotic overlord.


Forgot your password?

Comment: Re:That'll stop the terrorists! (Score 1) 234

by BitterOak (#48919271) Attached to: White House Drone Incident Exposes Key Security Gap

Because nobody with bad intentions defies FAA guidelines.

No, but at least they could be caught and stopped for defying those regulations hopefully before they do too much damage. If you don't even have those regulations in place, then you can't really do anything but watch and wait for them to do something more serious.

Comment: Re:First Sale (Score 2, Informative) 462

First sale doctrine doesn't obligate Ubisoft to honor the key.

Exactly right! What a lot of people don't understand is that the First Sale Doctrine is a defense not an offense. In other words, if you buy a copyrighted item, like a book, and resell it, the First Sale Doctrine protects you from getting successfully sued by the copyright holder for doing so. In other words, it is a defense. It does not however, put any obligations on the publisher to provide any support to ensure that these later customers can use the product. I'm not saying Ubisoft is doing the right thing here, but this really has nothing to do with the First Sale Doctrine.

Comment: Re:This guy is a crank. (Score 5, Informative) 81

by BitterOak (#48882497) Attached to: Quantum Computing Without Qubits

Classified information is purely a product of the government. They can't just classify information produced by citizens (citation: the first fucking ammendment, you dumbass crank).

Actually they can and have done so in the past, primarily in the field of cryptography, a field for which quantum computers might have important applications, so his fears are not unfounded.

Comment: Re:The Dangers of the World (Score 1) 784

by BitterOak (#48833319) Attached to: Parents Investigated For Neglect For Letting Kids Walk Home Alone

I do not know about Maryland in specific, but I have an Aunt that is a Guardian Ad Litem for children in another state. As soon as CPS is involved, you as a parent are essentially fucked.

Actually, it's the kids who are fucked. Sometimes literally, as children are much more likely to be sexually abused in a foster home than by real parents. (That's not to say MOST foster parents abuse kids; they don't. Most are very good people. But kids are statistically more likely to be abused in that way by non-parental guardians than by parents.)

Comment: Re:WTF (Score 1) 319

No, freedom of speech is the freedom to offend (or rather, "criticize") your government.

That's absolute poppycock. I can't fathom how you were modded up to +5. According to your logic, in the US, if the Democrats are in power, no one is allowed to criticize Republicans and vice versa because they're not the governing party. Political debate, which is at the heart of free speech, would become impossible.

Comment: Re:It may not be a lie. (Score 1) 172

you comment is completely wrong. Any court would first ask, why the fuck are you suing here when the action took place in another country, when you answer that you did sue there they would throw your case out, potentially with costs awarded to who you were suing. If this sort of thing was allowed companies and especially patent troll type companies would be launching suits all over the world to try to cash in as much as they could.

But if the files are being shared on Bittorrent, they're being made available to every country in the world, and these could all be regarded as separate instances of infringement.

Comment: It may not be a lie. (Score 3, Informative) 172

While Canadian law does indeed cap infringement awards at $5000, there's no reason the rights holders can't sue in U.S. courts where there is no such limit. Once the ISP reveals the identity, which they are required to do under Canadian law, nothing limits what the rights holder can do with that information. Canadian courts may not comply with judgements of U.S. courts, but if the defendant has any assets in the U.S. or travels there, they could be at risk.

Comment: Re:Seriously? (Score 1) 252

by BitterOak (#48731741) Attached to: US CTO Tries To Wean the White House Off Floppy Disks

1)- NO READ-ONLY MODE Unlike CDs, which are read only without giant hoops to jump through, there's no write-protect switch for thumb drives, or ability to trivially make them read-only.

That's a very good point. Floppy disks had write protect tabs, and the 3.5" ones had a little write protect slider switch. I don't know why thumb drive manufacturers don't include a similar feature on their drives. I think there'd be a real market for such a thing.

Remember -- only 10% of anything can be in the top 10%.