Comment: Hmmm (Score 1) 573
Comment: Here's how to do that, since I just did so (Score 1) 299
Comment: re: Butcher's pricing (Score 3, Interesting) 299
If he priced his stuff at $6 a pop I would have read the catalog. But $12? Now you're taking advantage.
Comment: Re:I disagree (Score 1) 448
It was a pretty good yarn and honestly I wanted that MMO to exist pretty badly. That would be AWESOME
Comment: Re:I'd say SPAZ hits a lot of the right notes (Score 1) 350
Comment: one anecdote here (Score 1) 908
They want to end-around first sale doctrine, that's fine. I'll just forego their products.
This is about First Sale Doctrine, not whether or not I'll resell my stuff. I use Steam so it's moot anyhow.
Comment: False Equivalency Horseshit (Score 1) 954
There are simply not enough taxable dollars in that lofty 1% realm to honestly make a difference. It makes for great popular sentiment as it supposedly impacts those "other" people. I also haven't heard a single viable argument as to how it is better to have that money get into the hands of a government that has shown a complete inability to manage money rather than let that money continue to flow into the economy.
Actually, there's enough to reverse most of the ballooning deficit strictly by reinstating the Bush tax cuts. Furthermore, the best argument is the one that every deficit hawk all over the tubes are stating: current debt levels are untenable and need to be reversed.
But yeah, it's helpful to pretend this is an intractable problem and "both sides are doing it". But it's a lie and repeating it makes you a liar.
Comment: and the buzzword bingo continues (Score 1) 138
I imagine we call them ERPs to jack up the price and set up a business model where there's continuous fucking^W servicing of the customer.
Honestly, after working within them for the past decade, I can't imagine anyone would want to calcify their business with such a tightly coupled morass requiring continuous upgrades.
Just terrible
Comment: that and the two accounts contradict (Score 1, Interesting) 735
Comment: eh, I see his point re: Progressives (Score 1) 80
I like to think of it as "nobody has a monopoly on bad ideas".
The larger point, progressives want to expand the power of the state, is a little fallacious.
That really ties into paternalism, how hard/soft do you like it (if at all), and where is it appropriate. Those questions/answers don't fall on either side of the political spectrum, I think. (e.g. Republicans believe in hard paternalism when it comes to a woman's body, whilst Democrats tend to believe in paternalism when it comes to health care)
Comment: Corporations (was unclear) (Score 1) 884
Sorry I wasn't more clear.
Comment: funny that (Score 1) 884
RE: taxation - I only agree because the top 10% pays zero (ZERO) taxes in America, with our 35% tax rate.
Making that more sane is the first step, but no matter what happens corporations have to step up and pay for doing business in America. Period.
Comment: Citation Needed (Score 2) 225
You're just spreading FUD.
Comment: in my experience (Score 2) 245
Perhaps with a new restaurant to get the word out it works, but every Groupon rest. we've been to in the last year failed.
I don't think that's Groupon's fault, however. I think a Groupon deal is a very good indicator if a restaurant is struggling.