Forgot your password?

typodupeerror

Comment: Re:Gee, really? (Score 1) 530

by ari_j (#39928681) Attached to: Why You Don't Want a $99 Xbox 360
I ran an amortization schedule. The effective interest rate on the Xbox comes out to closer to 25% than 20%. Even on a 20% card, making the payments over a course of 2 years (so long as you actually make those payments, which for the Xbox fees seems to be a little less than most minimum payments but we'll leave that to the side) still beats the $99 Xbox.

Comment: Re:Smartphones, Cars, Premium Cable, pest control (Score 1) 530

by ari_j (#39928617) Attached to: Why You Don't Want a $99 Xbox 360
I did it to compare my Chevrolet Silverado to a Prius, based on mileage and leaving out maintenance. With $5/gallon gas it came out to over 400,000 miles of driving before the Prius broke even. That's 20-30 years for my driving habits. Only time will tell if the Prius becomes a mainstay of classic car shows.

Comment: Re:Last bastion (Score 1) 963

by ari_j (#39869035) Attached to: Last Bastion For Climate Dissenters Crumbling
It's the same with U.S. Presidents hosting peace talks between Israel and Palestine. They can say "I worked for peace in the Middle East!" without any risk of either making the situation worse or losing that political card for future Presidents. If the United States switched to nuclear power and electric cars, the politicians who pander to the "green" vote would lose a political playing card. Fortunately, there is little to no risk of that happening and any risk that does exist is easy to eliminate by also fighting against nuclear energy.
The Military

Why Drones Could Be the Future of Missile Defense 167

Posted by Soulskill
from the cheaper-than-licensing-star-wars dept.
An anonymous reader writes "With North Korea's failed missile launch Friday, it is clear many nations around the globe are attempting to acquire missiles that can carry larger payloads and go further. Such moves have made the United States and its allies very nervous. Missile defense has been debated since the 1980's with such debate back once again the headlines. Most missile defense platforms have technical issues and are very expensive. One idea: use drones instead. '... a high-speed (~3.5 to 5.0 km/s), two-stage, hit-to-kill interceptor missile, launched from a Predator-type UAV can defeat many of these ballistic missile threats in their boost phase.' Could a Drone really take down a North Korea missile? 'A physics-based simulator can estimate the capabilities of a high-altitude, long endurance UAV-launched boost-phase interceptor (HALE BPI) launched from an altitude of approximately 60,000 feet. Enabled by the revolution in UAVs, this proposed boost-phase interceptor, based on off-the-shelf technology, can be deployed in operationally feasible stations on the periphery of North Korea.'"

Never have so many understood so little about so much. -- James Burke

Working...