Catch up on stories from the past week (and beyond) at the Slashdot story archive

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment: Re:Life form? (Score 1) 335

by khallow (#48640707) Attached to: The Dominant Life Form In the Cosmos Is Probably Superintelligent Robots

Male rabbits can't form a new rabbit without female rabbits.

So a female rabbit is part of the right conditions. Next.

The rock is just as self-describing; scan the rock see what its made of and that is the information required by a suitable 3rd party contraption to create a new rock.

No. The chemical compound is not the rock. You also have to scan in the processes by which the rock was formed. And rocks don't actually have a means to sustain their non-existent information patterns anyway.

Comment: Re:Sure (Score 1) 576

by khallow (#48640671) Attached to: Skeptics Would Like Media To Stop Calling Science Deniers 'Skeptics'

I mention that there is no such thing as a model which supports anti-AGW

You mean the "there's no need to explain what doesn't exist" model? I think you are mistaken.

I used my highly advanced deductive reasoning to assume that you meant that the models not supporting the anti-AGW argument, which would of course be all of them.

Then let's speak of these models which actually accurately model current and future climate and stop wasting our time with those that don't.

Comment: Re:Sure (Score 1) 576

by khallow (#48640653) Attached to: Skeptics Would Like Media To Stop Calling Science Deniers 'Skeptics'

What if the sun, or something extra-solar, is causing global warming? Doesn't matter. We should do what we must (within reason) to reverse it, even if we're wrong about the true cause.

Nonsense. You now have a system that at best is much harder to control with human action than expected. The solutions that work for a system strongly controlled by human action fail when those conditions no longer hold.

Nor is there such a compelling reason to do anything about the global warming. A good portion of the environmentalism argument is that global warming is human-induced and hence, should be reversed as an artificial imposition on the world. If it is not human-induced, then the moral compulsion is no longer there.

Comment: Re:Sure... (Score 1) 300

So inside a retail store are thousands and thousands of tiny little cost centers? Does that mean that the retail store is also thousands and thousands of tiny little profit centers?

Or would a rational person perhaps look at the store as a profit center because it makes money, despite having overhead costs like ... the screws that hold the front door to its hinges? Or is each of those screws a cost center, in your view?

"It's ten o'clock... Do you know where your AI programs are?" -- Peter Oakley

Working...