No. First, as your parenthesis note, batteries are a big part of the cost of the vehicle, so make that $25k. Second, just as the cost of making a bottle of pill is only a dollar but still costs hundreds, the 'cost' of a vehicle has only partly to do with the cost of the parts that make it up. There is the cost of the factory (all those robots), insurance, salaries (though the robots reduce those), R&D, design, advertising, safety testing, QA, transportation, show rooms, and profit.
Finally, the (current) Telsa isn't a $15k car. Fit and finish, inside and outside materials, suspension quality and design, electronics mean that even without the cost of the powertrain, it's going to be an expensive car. When you get in a cheap econobox car, it is different from getting into a (for example) BMW 7-series, but they are made from the same fundamental components. You _could_ make an electric car that costs $15k without the batteries; in fact, you can buy one! Go look at the Mitsubishi i-MiEV. Is that what you want? Of course not; you want a Tesla!!
Extraterrestrial life is an evolutionary concept; it does not comport with the biblical teachings of the uniqueness of the earth and the distinct spiritual position of human beings.
So, Earth is special, Jesus is special, so humans are special, so aliens don't exist.
...If you look at something like escort service and prostitution it's massively dominated by male customers who pay for women to pretend to be their girlfriends/lovers or even dressing up RealDolls.
You bring up an interesting point: would a sexbot replace a girlfriend, or would it be more likely to replace a prostitute. I would guess prostitute. I would have a girlfriend (insert joke here) because I want a relationship with another human being, with mutually agreed-upon sex, with some conflicting issues regarding frequency and style. I would want a prostitute because I want sex when and how I want it without a relationship. A sexbot fills the second far more than the first. So, the end effect would be a decrease in prostitution / escorts and their knock on effects. This would seem to be a win for women, not a loss.
I was interested in this article because I thought it was on knot theory and practical applications of it. If you (the dear reader) has some time, the book 'The Knot Book' by Colin Adams is a nice introduction to knot theory. Really fascinating, and will get you thinking in terms of topology. And, like much mathematics that started by just thinking about something interesting from a mathematcial point of view, it turns out to be useful in a number of areas.
That said, this is totally not about knot theory, it is about modelling physical knots. And of course, they did the typical physicist thing, which is to take a really complicated thing, model the absolutely simplest aspect about it, derive some results, and then claim victory; while completely not answering the complicated (and more interesting) questions. I had a similar response when seeing what physicist did with modelling atoms, where the idea was to make a model using quantum mechanics of atoms, and then it turns out they did the hydrogen atom, and said, basically, 'the rest is details, we're not going to do those'. Wait, what?
I exaggerate, but the distance between the claims of physicists and what they can actually model, predict, etc, are huge. Yes, I know that the models are insanely complicated, and that's why you can't model them, but the problem is the claims.
That doesn't sound right. I expect that the men completely outnumber the women, and that the 'women' are largely fake, but only 12,000?
With all the advertising that AM has done, and with the huge number of women online (consider pinterest for heavens sake), and the huge number of women that have affairs, it seems unlikely to me that only 12,000 actual women signed up.
Stuff like laundry? Not that big a deal when the machine does all of the work and I just have to load the wash, move the washed clothes to the dryer, and put them away when they're dry....
As you say, it's different things for different people. If you have an extended family, or have several small children, the laundry is simply absurd. It is something that you have to do basically every day. And it is a pain in the ass to have to check every pocket first (because otherwise you get pens, candy, or other stuff in the wash), un-ball them (since kids are amazingly good as making their clothes into tightly wrapped origami when taking them off), and then at the end folding a zillion shirts that have one tiny sleeve out the wrong way. A robot that could spend an hour or two a day doing laundry would be a magical device for me and many other people, on the order of the changes of washing machines or dish washers in the first place.
Complete lack of opposition to slavery, not a mention of rape in the New Testament. It appears that Jesus was all for a male-dominated, slave-keeping (probably including female slaves for sex) society. So, nothing to indicate that he would oppose it. He might think that it was up to the father / slave ower rather than the women though.
More importantly though, I think that the parent was referring to the lack of support for education, equal opportunity, health care, and other things for children that the parent thought Jesus would have been likely to support. And it seems to me that the people that most oppose abortion also are the ones that prevent those things for children.
(Plus, he seemed to like hookers, and we all know how they love to have abortions).
HOST SYSTEM RESPONDING, PROBABLY UP...