Forgot your password?

typodupeerror

Comment: Re:doesn't help people take games seriously either (Score 1) 731

by BattleApple (#44029399) Attached to: Sexism Still a Problem At E3

I've known plenty of guys who scream at the TV during a game. I can't say I've ever seen one of them doing it while partially or fully unclothed (thank goodness).

Yeah, they save that particular behavior for when they're actually in a sports arena and being broadcast to millions of other guys screaming at their TVs

Comment: Re:Propaganda (Score 1) 198

by Omestes (#44023871) Attached to: AT&T Rolls Out iPhone Wireless Emergency Alerts

Actually it did via various access laws that give politicians very low rates for campaign advertising. The claim behind the laws was that a network has to provide equal time but the reality is that it lowered rates.

Huh? EAS doesn't even have rates, its emergency broadcast. It has never had advertising, and the idea of equal time on it is not applicable.

Comment: Re:Completely useless... (Score 1) 198

by Omestes (#44023549) Attached to: AT&T Rolls Out iPhone Wireless Emergency Alerts

What can/would the President send to every citizen on this other than a declaration of nation wide Martial Law?
Storms and disasters are LOCAL issues

Kids these days... they exists mostly for nuclear war, and invasions. Something that was a background threat not that long ago. They haven't been used, thankfully, but if they ever need to be used, it would be a good thing. I really don't see having the potential to send out an emergency broadcast as a bad thing.

Imagine in the case of a truly large scale disaster (such as an asteroid) , or an actual nuclear attack, not being in range of an active TV or radio...

What can/would the President send to every citizen on this other than a declaration of nation wide Martial Law?

Ah... you're one of them. But even accepting that this is something that might happen in our lifetimes, I would think that some segment of our population (the rarely vindicated paranoids) would like to know, so they can grab their 10,000 firearms and cans of beans, and go out with their bullhorns to scream at their neighbors "I told you so!".

Comment: Re:Nice biased wording there (Score 1) 332

by Omestes (#44001605) Attached to: Intel Removes "Free" Overclocking From Standard Haswell CPUs

I admit, including cores in my silly example was a bad idea. Cores is still something that matters, somewhat. Most things are still horribly optimized for multiple cores, but in some "normal" applications, like encoding, they do matter. But, if you take a high end x-core AMD, and a high end x-core Intel, the difference will still be very subtle.

Comment: Re:Thankfully (Score 1) 137

by Omestes (#44001435) Attached to: Kodak Ends Production of Acetate Base For Photographic Film

Hey, I've got a $10 Holga lens for my mirrorless setup. It was $10 (cheapest lens I own by a large margin), it takes fun pictures at parties, and it was ten dollars. I've been tempted to get a lomo or holga cheap film body for awhile now... Just because it is amusing, and exponentially cheaper than some of the other film cameras I want "for fun" (an old Leica, or Voigtlander Bessa). I say "fun", because I have a full DSLR kit, and a full mirrorless kit, both of these fulfill all my serious and professional needs. Holga and Lomos are for playing around with, and for taking photography back to its simplest principles. They fill the same roll as, and I hate to say this, Instagram.

There are still film labs floating around. Most towns with a college probably have some. Also, and I might be wrong, but I think the Lomography guys will develop film for you. You can ship it out of course, or drop it off at most Costcos or Walgreens. I'm not sure if those last two hold for 120, though.

I actually have a good deal of respect for Lomography, they've been working on keeping film stock alive, which benefits more than just them, or the mythical "hipsters".

I'm still waiting for the advent of the computer science groupie.

Working...