Please create an account to participate in the Slashdot moderation system

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Slashdot videos: Now with more Slashdot!

  • View

  • Discuss

  • Share

We've improved Slashdot's video section; now you can view our video interviews, product close-ups and site visits with all the usual Slashdot options to comment, share, etc. No more walled garden! It's a work in progress -- we hope you'll check it out (Learn more about the recent updates).

×

Comment: Re:real children + real pornongraphy = ??? (Score 1) 639

by Axigrav (#28478255) Attached to: Tennesee Man Charged In "Virtual Pornography" Case

And if they are public photographs there is no reason they need to give consent for their use. Don't confuse consent for usage of ordinary public photographs with consent for participating in pornography.

This right here scares me. I suppose I could try to be 'William Forrester' and never leave my home, paying for people to bring all my 'needs' to me. However, real life dictates that I must leave my home and go out into 'public' to lead a somewhat civilized life.

So if someone takes a picture of me out in public, are you saying that they can do anything they want with that photo of me without my consent?

Ya'll hear about the geometer who went to the beach to catch some rays and became a tangent ?

Working...