Here's the direct link to the article for future convenience (it's at the top of the above link right now but I doubt it'll stay there): https://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130127/19023721799/redditor-points-out-flaws-simcitys-online-only-drm-gets-banned-ea-his-troubles.shtml
Yes, because the Daily Mail runs the UK, these days.
The ARM version of Surface runs Windows RT, just like other ARM based Windows 8 tablets.
No Windows desktop, only Metro, err, I mean, "Modern UI". Can only install apps from the Windows Store, subject to an Apple-like approval process. $49 for a personal, or $99+ for a corporate, developer license (IIRC).
The x86 version will run the desktop, but I still don't want one, because it'll use the Intel "Clover Trail" Atom and Linux distributions won't run on it (or rather they'll run, but will get a battery life of about 10 minutes, due to closed power management specifications; useless).
Surface is a toy. Keep buying laptops.
What exactly does this desktop of yours look like, and is it situated underneath a bridge?
(In the UK) They're one of the BT DSL and fiber resellers, they're a little pricey, but completely awesome.
There's no filtering or traffic shaping of any kind, no restrictions on running servers, and they offer web-based constant quality monitoring -- by-the-minute graphs of bandwidth usage, latency and packet loss on the line. Ring them up and you're immediately speaking to a technically competent person in the UK, no answering machines, no outsourced support.
I'm on the FTTC service (VDSL). I get 76Mbps down, 16Mbps up to speedtest.net with an 8ms ping time, and it bears out pretty well in the real world too (8.5MB/s downloads from Steam, 30ms ping to Diablo 3, Rift etc). And I get 5 static IPv4 addresses and an IPv6
I switched from Virgin Media a while ago. The AAISP service blows Virgin out of the water in every way, even the top tier 100Mbps option. Friends are especially impressed when we do a Skype video call and my side auto-adjusts itself to a multi-megabit HD stream (Virgin's connections have very low upload speeds).
No, this isn't astroturfing -- just a satisfied customer!
Not helpful for you probably, but Android 4.0 fixes this problem. Bottom right button brings up a running-app switcher.
I like banshee. It resolves the track details and album art of CDs I rip, supports a wide range of formats, copes well with my large music directory and its file and directory name conventions, has working gapless playback (rhythmbox's never quite worked right whenever I tried), and integrates well with last.fm.
I didn't even know it was built on Mono until a couple of weeks ago. I haven't noticed any sluggishness, and I'm not running it on a terribly fast PC.
She might not want to upgrade, but she *needs* to upgrade, to fix security vulnerabilities.
That's the #1 problem here.
I was a long time Ubuntu user. When I upgraded to Ubuntu 11.04, I found that Unity was unusable. Forget opinions about the redesigned, touch-friendly interface: it was broken. Menu items not appearing; rampant graphics corruption in the menu bar; window dragging taking several seconds to redraw the window; lots more. Does anyone have impressions of how buggy Unity is in this new release?
(Yes, proprietary nvidia driver. Playing nice with it is non-negotiable. Gnome 3 and KDE both do.)
As a power user and a developer, I switched from Ubuntu to Fedora after I discovered how awful Unity was in 11.04. I'm very happy with it. YMMV (I'm a Gnome 3 fan -- but if you don't like it, there's XFCE, LXDE, xmonad, etc etc).
...anyone sharing a public WiFi with you can be a man-in-the-middle...
What you described doesn't just "cost a lot". It's security cloud cuckoo-land...
Do they mean a PKI, with certificates?
See: Email encryption (S/MIME etc) -- do you know anyone who uses it? In the unlikely event that you do, can you say they're not a huge nerd? Hell, I work as a security specialist and I don't use it because it's too hard.
Also see: DNSSEC -- even the big network operators are having difficulty deploying it, let alone anyone else.
And the https system for web certificates, which only "works" because it's fundamentally insecure (every browser trusts a huge list of CAs, any one of which can sign a certificate for any site, which is all that's required to impersonate the site -- and that's before we get into mixed content and all the other problems).
Passwords short enough to memorise are now short enough to crack in many cases. See recent article about hash reversal with GPUs.
Use a password safe. Just search -- there are lots around. I use KeePassX (small, cross-platform -- Windows, GNU/Linux, Mac, Android, no install required on Windows). It'll make strong passwords for you and save them in a tiny encrypted file you can copy to all your devices, with a couple of clicks. The only passwords you'll need to remember are your local login password and the password to the safe.
Life is better without having my web accounts chain-hacked or having to clutter my brain remembering a bazillion passwords...