Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!


Forgot your password?
Polls on the front page of Slashdot? Is the world coming to an end?! Nope; read more about it. ×

Comment: Re:Was wondering when this would happen (Score 0) 290

by Arkem Beta (#35568750) Attached to: Best-Selling Author Refuses $500k; Self-Publishes Instead
I think you would enjoy Neil Gaiman's work less if it weren't edited and I'm sure you like cover art too. Maybe you enjoy having places like amazon.com to buy books from and without a publisher's marketing effort you might not have even heard of Neil Gaiman.

The $20 price isn't all profiteering, there are a lot of people who work on creating and selling a book and they don't work for free.

Comment: Most people? (Score 1) 794

by Arkem Beta (#34445704) Attached to: PayPal Withdraws WikiLeaks Donation Service
"PayPal's move is unlikely to result in many more people boycotting the company, as most knowledgeable on-line users will have been refusing to use them for years for a wide variety of abusive practices."

I don't think that the word most means what the submitter thinks it means. Either that or the submitter is implying that if you don't boycott Paypal you aren't knowledgeable.

Cyberwarrior Shortage Threatens US Security 394

Posted by CmdrTaco
from the who-wouldn't-want-that-on-their-card dept.
An anonymous reader writes "US security officials say the country's cyberdefenses are not up to the challenge. In part, it's due to a severe shortage of computer security specialists and engineers with the skills and knowledge necessary to do battle against would-be adversaries. The protection of US computer systems essentially requires an army of cyberwarriors, but the recruitment of that force is suffering. 'We don't have sufficiently bright people moving into this field to support those national security objectives as we move forward in time,' says James Gosler, a veteran cybersecurity specialist who has worked at the CIA, the National Security Agency, and the Energy Department."

Comment: Re:100,000 preregistered? (Score 2, Interesting) 273

by Arkem Beta (#32711014) Attached to: ICANN Approves<nobr> <wbr></nobr>.xxx Suffix For Porn Websites

I was also there when *cough* alt.sex was created; it took all the sex off mainstream usenet and put it in one tidy place. .xxx will do the same over time

Because all companies restrict themselves to .com and other organisations stick to their respective .org, .net or .edu?
Because all US based domains are registered under .us?

I don't think .xxx is going to change anything at all, especially if ICANN introduces custom TLDs for sale.

Comment: Re:$11bn?!?! (Score 1) 120

Wikipedia suggests that a third of Telstra was worth $14bn in 1997. The current market cap of Telstra is $41.8bn (which actually suggests that the company is worth less today than it was in 1997). Telstra's total assets run to approximately $37bn. The Government still owns about 10% of Telstra through its future fund.

$11bn would be about 26% of the total value of all Telstra's stock or 29% of the value of its assets.

Comment: Re:Most definately is a crime. (Score 1) 198

by Arkem Beta (#32537468) Attached to: Google Releases Wi-Fi Sniffing Audit

IANAL but analogies rarely hold any legal water because the laws that govern each activity are completely separate.

The Missouri statute quoted above includes the 'reasonable grounds to believe that he has authorization' provision and I doubt that any sexual assault legislation would have a similar provision.

Whether or not a court would find that Google does have these 'reasonable grounds' is too complicated a question for me to more than guess at. It may be that the onus is on Google to prove that their belief was reasonable or alternatively there might be precedent about what constitutes 'reasonable grounds' that is applicable to the case.

Of course unless Google is charged with violating this particular Missouri law the question isn't particularly relevant.

Comment: Re:Well, it's not a popular view ... (Score 1) 198

by Arkem Beta (#32537128) Attached to: Google Releases Wi-Fi Sniffing Audit
A reply to your aside: It's not the encryption between me and my mail server that I'm worried about (that's easy to control), it's the lack of encryption between my mail server and wherever the mail I send is going. How many mail servers are configured to talk SSL encrypted SMTP? I know about STARTTLS but do mail servers generally try and use it?

Comment: Re:Caching? (Score 1) 169

by Arkem Beta (#32495124) Attached to: NZ Plan For Fiber To the Home
Many if not most Australian ISPs maintain large transparent proxy servers to meet this requirement. It worked really well in the past before streaming media became big, between youtube and bittorrent standard caching schemes don't seem to cut it. Even with many of the big CDNs having an Australian presence there is only so much good that local caching can do.

10 to the 6th power Bicycles = 2 megacycles