Forgot your password?

typodupeerror

Comment: Re:But this is what I'm not fine with... (Score 1) 347

by geminidomino (#40124557) Attached to: Can You Buy Tech With a Clean Conscience?

As far as Hope and Change, well do you expect somebody to come in and cure the ills building in the political system for the past 30 years in one term?

Your bias is showing, too. You can only give his water-walking holiness a pass by saying "he can't fix it all in one term" by conveniently ignoring that he and his administration are actually making negative progress, by continuing and even expanding the same abuses that have been going on for the past 30 years.

Comment: Re:If you're subscribed to him.. (Score 1) 335

by geminidomino (#40111651) Attached to: Zuckerberg Updates Relationship Status To "Married"

The original statement was that eye witness testimony wasn't "Evidence" I pointed out that was wrong. I didn't say anything about whether it was sufficient for conviction.

No, my statement was that the PROBLEM in question is that it IS considered "evidence" (in the legal sense) even when there is a clear conflict of interest. And since you bring it up, you should take a look around. In several jurisdictions, it IS grounds for convictions, or at least for extrajudicial punishment. For example, any state (such as Florida) that requires, BY LAW, a man accused of abuse to be removed from the house and a restraining order issued.

When you whined that it shouldn't be sufficient, I pointed out that it is considered sufficient in traffic court, and there aren't large groups of pissed off men protesting that.

And I ignored that because it is 1) A strawman, completely irrelevant to the matter at hand. We're talking about a woman being able to drop the A-bomb for a slam dunk in court, whether or not there's any other evidence.
2) Also fucking wrong. Just look at slashdot everytime some slow news day has a "Geek fights traffic ticket with physics/gadget/portal gun". Plenty of people take issue with the inherent trust the police get, even in traffic court.

My parents met as probation officers, and my mother and sister worked for the state in family law, and my father was a lawyer in family law. So I have an idea of family law.

Then ask them if a lawyer they've had to deal with/oppose in court (since I'm sure that, like you, they are absolute paragons and would never do such a thing) has ever recommended to a woman that she should make complaints of abuse to strengthen her case.

Fuck you. You are lying. You are pissed off abuser, or defender of abusers who lies in court and is lying here.

Um.. yeah. Everyone knows slashdotters don't have girlfriends, remember?

But you're clearly illiterate. I'm not defending abusers, I'm defending those falsely accused of being abusers. I had thought I'd made that clear from the beginning. Maybe I used too many big words.

But that little quote right there pretty much gives lie to any of your claims of logic being on your side.

Comment: Re:If you're subscribed to him.. (Score 1) 335

by geminidomino (#40107707) Attached to: Zuckerberg Updates Relationship Status To "Married"

You're saying that a man complaining about his soon-to-be-ex-wife lying about abuse should be given less credibility than the accuser, based on the fact that he's being accused of being abusive.

So not only can't you grasp the flaw in your reasoning, you clearly have no grasp of human nature or the inherent scumminess of family law.

Oh, wait. I'm criticising family law. That must make me an abuser!

Simpleton.

Comment: Re:Fairly well known issue (Score 1) 558

by geminidomino (#40106905) Attached to: New Music Boss, Worse Than Old Music Boss

I assume you mean 32GB. 32MB isn't even enough for one CD using quality settings that would make Beethoven's teeth grind. :)

I'm honestly surprised that people still put up with the 25-minutes-per-hour of radio ads these days. Even my mom has a little 4GB Sansa that connects into the car stereo.

I'd go nuts without my iPod (the only HDD based mp3 player I can find anymore) and my Discworld audiobooks.

Comment: Re:3 Words (Score 1) 409

One of our HOA board members at my parents' place works for the California DMV, and illegally looks up the license plates of people parked in our visitor parking spots.

Since my old car was given to me by my parents, I kept getting nasty letters from them, claiming that I was a resident illegally parking in visitor's spots.

I wrote back saying that I was sure that the DMV would be interested in finding out who it was that was illegally conducting these searches, and I never heard from them again.

Comment: Re:Is it a good alternative to Ubuntu for a novice (Score 2) 213

by geminidomino (#40097199) Attached to: Linux Mint 13 (Maya) Has Arrived

Also, I'm curious to know which headaches you're running into with Windows 7, because I can't think of any offhand. XP? sure. Vista? Of course. 7? nothing comes to mind.

The window Z-layering is frequently idiotic. I don't care one way or another how anyone feels about "click to focus" vs. "focus follows mouse" but I don't think it's unreasonable to expect that if the DM is raising a window to the to top, it should, maybe, give it focus, and if it's going to raise it behind other windows, it shouldn't.

Of course, the apparent decision making between which it chooses seems to border on the non-deterministic. And, for added lulz, the windows "stick". Alt-tabbing or clicking on another overlapped window will give it focus, but NOT raise it. The fix I've found is to have to minimize it and re-raise it.

Total PITA. I would have thought it was my PC, but it happens on both mine and my machine at work.

Tomorrow's computers some time next month. -- DEC

Working...