Forgot your password?

typodupeerror

Comment: Re:Yet another ham-handed attempt to eliminate gun (Score 1) 731

by Applekid (#43787837) Attached to: House Bill Would Mandate Smart Gun Tech By U.S. Manufacturers

Aside from the fact that the technology doesn't exist... What if I want to let a friend shoot my gun, for example when I was teaching someone to shoot? What if I wanted to try a friend's gun so I could see if I liked it? How about collectible guns? The last firearm I bought was a WWII vintage Finnish rifle. What if I wanted to buy a very-collectable WWII 1911? Would that be legal? It's just another blatant attempt to restrict my constitutional rights. If you want to pass gun control, amend the Constitution. Stop wasting our time with this kind of legislative theater.

All guns should be retrofitted with the biometric checks. That black powder musket must how have a $200 electronic device bolted to it or else you're a mass-murderer. Trying to let a friend use a gun? Nuh uh, you must transfer the gun at an FFL so your friend gets background checked, mental health history checked, political affiliations checked, and a credit check. When he returns it, you must transfer it back to yourself to make sure you didn't become a criminal within that 30 minute period or develop a nervous tick or become an alcoholic.

Anything short of that and you want to murder children.

Comment: Re: Flawed "Think of the Children" as usual (Score 1) 731

by Applekid (#43787769) Attached to: House Bill Would Mandate Smart Gun Tech By U.S. Manufacturers

This is the central problem. For safety, you should keep your guns in a locked gun safe without ammo in them with trigger locks on them. They are completely useless as a self defense item. For them to be useful you need it loaded under your pillow with no trigger lock, but unfortunately this gets you killed by your wife or your mistake. What we need is a compromise between the two.

There are quick-release gun safes available that open quickly with a combination of keypresses. Inside you can store a loaded self defense weapon. Just like the responsibility of handling a weapon, one needs to practice practice practice entering the combination, so it can be done during duress, and to consistently verify the safe functions properly.

Comment: Re:But I like guns! (Score 1) 731

by Applekid (#43787637) Attached to: House Bill Would Mandate Smart Gun Tech By U.S. Manufacturers

Define "sensible". This bill is not "sensible" by any definition I can think of. How about forcing states to add their mental health records to the instant background check database? Less than 30 states currently do. God forbid we violate the privacy of fucking crazy people.

Do you have information on which states do? I'm curious what guidelines they use.

Because the mental illnesses behind psychopathic killer are different from the mental illnesses behind being afraid of crowds, for example.

Comment: Re: But I like guns! (Score 1) 731

by Applekid (#43787573) Attached to: House Bill Would Mandate Smart Gun Tech By U.S. Manufacturers

Parent's point is that there are very few actual accidents and most car deaths are completely preventable by people paying some attention instead of living their lives in a constant haze of confusion and apathy.

Which actually also goes for guns. Proper storage and handling, mental health services, education and economic opportunity, and just plain not trying to rob, rape, intimidate, or threaten others would do great things for preventing the actual gun deaths.

Yahoo!

Yahoo Pinkie-Swears It Won't Ruin Tumblr 157

Posted by samzenpus
from the you-will-be-assimilated dept.
Nerval's Lobster writes "Yahoo has agreed to acquire Tumblr for $1.1 billion. As you know, Yahoo is a major corporation with a need to monetize its assets in a way that makes its shareholders happy, leaving open the question of whether it'll alter Tumblr's DNA in order to make the latter more of a significant cash generator. But at least for the moment, Yahoo seems content to leave its new property alone. 'Per the agreement and our promise not to screw it up, Tumblr will be independently operated as a separate business,' read the company's press release. 'The product, service and brand will continue to be defined and developed separately with the same Tumblr irreverence, wit, and commitment to empower creators.' Tumblr CEO David Karp, who has been known to make some very anti-advertising comments in the past, will remain in place. Even so, anyone who likes Tumblr may have some cause for concern, because Yahoo has a history of making high-profile acquisitions that subsequently implode. Back in 1999, for example, it paid over $3 billion for GeoCities, another blogging network that it eventually shut down after years of failing the update the property. In 2005, it acquired popular photo-sharing Website Flickr, which it likewise allowed to languish and die. That same year it bought Delicious, a popular Webpage-bookmarking site, and did exactly nothing with it. So when Yahoo starts off its Tumblr press release with a promise not to screw things up, it's a self-deprecating nod toward all that history. New Yahoo CEO Marissa Mayer has been on a bit of a buying spree of late, snatching up startups such as Summly in an attempt to make her company 'cool' and relevant."

Comment: Re:Don't give up hope yet. (Score 1) 138

Until they make a robot you can see commiserates with you when you tell him about how you're only there because your wife's mother's in town, or her aunt Flo is visiting and she wants you to go down on her... and convince you he truly understands, and that he's been there himself... the bar tender's job is safe. Also, until a robot can determine you're drunk, and ensure it's not serving booze to an under-age drinker... etc., this is just a toy.

In the era of ubiquitous data mining, all those situations are knowable, and a display or speaker will be able to specially craft the exact phrase you want to hear, but aren't consciously aware of what you want to hear.

Nintendo

Nintendo Hijacks Ad Revenue From Fan-Created YouTube Playthroughs 297

Posted by Soulskill
from the pay-it-backward dept.
mcleland writes "The BBC reports that Nintendo is now using the content ID match feature in YouTube to identify screencap videos of people playing their games. They then take over the advertising that appears with the video, and thus the ad revenue. Nintendo gets it all, and the creators of these videos (which are like extended fan-made commercials for the games) get nothing. Corporate gibberish to justify this: 'In a statement, the firm said the move was part of an "on-going push to ensure Nintendo content is shared across social media."'"

Comment: Re:Another job is lost. (Score 1) 138

Back in my bar hopping days.

The bars I went back to were the ones I could have a conversation with the bartender, regardless of their sex.

You don't pick up the bartender. It's nice to chat with them when they aren't busy.

Interaction is part of the bar scene.

Hard to do that with a robot

Looks like you'll have to chat up the robot maintenance guy instead.

Businesses

Ask Slashdot: Do You Trust When a Vendor Tells You To Buy New Parts? 156

Posted by timothy
from the don't-clench dept.
Nerval's Lobster writes "Roughly 85 percent of IT managers polled by Forrester said they would hold onto networking infrastructure longer, but vendors retire products prematurely in an effort to force customers to upgrade. In a response that may seem familiar to anyone who's ever been pressured into buying a maintenance contract—either by an enterprise vendor or a major electronics retailer—over 80 percent of the 304 respondents said they don't like the misrepresented cost savings, new fees, and inflexible pricing models—but buy the products anyway. One of the survey's interesting points is that IT decision makers aren't willing to contradict the vendor. The uncertainty seems to come from the fact that the vendor may in fact be right—and a customer who contradicts what they're saying may end up shouldering the blame if the equipment goes south. It's the 'you never got fired for buying IBM' argument, applied to the networking space. The problem, of course, is that the vendor often works for its own agenda. Do you upgrade when the vendor (or reseller) suggests you do so? Or do you stick to your own way of doing things?"
Television

Amazon Reportedly Working On Set-Top Box 100

Posted by Soulskill
from the aren't-we-trying-to-get-rid-of-those dept.
Bloomberg is reporting that Amazon has plans to release its own television set-top box later this year. The device will stream video over the internet from Amazon's video service catalog. From the article: "Amazon Chief Executive Officer Jeff Bezos is pushing the company into a broadening array of hardware, including tablets, electronic readers and a planned smartphone. ... The set-top box is being developed by Amazon’s Lab126 division, based in Cupertino, California -- the city that’s also home to Apple. Lab126 has toyed with building connected television devices for several years, the people familiar with the effort said. ... Plans for pricing couldn't be determined. Amazon’s typical strategy is to sell hardware at competitive prices, sometimes at a loss, with the intent of making up for discounts through sales of content, including books and movies. Amazon could also use the set-top box to promote its online store.

"If you own a machine, you are in turn owned by it, and spend your time serving it..." -- Marion Zimmer Bradley, _The Forbidden Tower_

Working...