...going for a walk. A good walk works wonders and is a little less extreme than electrodes in the brain. That said, my depression was a side effect of a long term illness and the walking may have had other health benefits that improved my mindset.
That said, walking might not be a great idea if you'd lost your job, sold your car, etc. etc...
...that's two years to do something about it. What does everyone expect; Microsoft to support it forever?
14 years of support seems pretty generous - I mean how many versions of OS do Apple currently support? Certainly not all the way back to OS X 10.0. I'm also sure that a lot of those embedded and industrial systems will be updated before then. That's more the job of the manufacturers than Microsoft.
Plus even Jobs' comments about the iPhone 4 being "like a Leica camera" betray the fact to yes, their designers look to past gadgets for inspiration, so I wouldn't be surprised if someone given the task of locating the port saw the Polaroid camera and went "let's try that"...
Sometimes I wish I could remove the Stocks and Weather apps built into my iPhone, but Apple won't let me, even though there are alternatives... I just have to stick them in a Crap I Don't Use folder on the last screen...
I sure as hell wouldn't want it to crap out if I was loading a sidewinder missile onto a plane. Ignoring the very remote possibility of an explosion, the sudden appearance of hundreds of pounds in my hands is sure to cause some rather nasty injuries...
There was nothing in his speech about shutting down networks, merely targeting those inciting violence and disorder.
In that respect, it's bringing social networking in line with other UK media which are also bound not to incite violence etc. It's certainly not a shutdown of a service in any way.
Many cameras - not phones - cameras, had this functionality way before the iPhone did. Granted that in most circumstances it was only available in a camera application, but I had my Nokia N95 about three months before the original iPhone came out, and it used the exact same chip to do the same thing...
I'm pretty sure that some high end digital SLRs had this function, possibly as far back as 2003 if memory serves me correctly.
So, why are Mozilla still patching FF 3.xx versions of Firefox?
That's pretty much based on the same open standards as FF5, so why not ditch it and support the most recent version only? Otherwise it's in danger of becoming Mozilla's XP/IE6...
From where I'm standing, it's interesting that they patched 3.6. I can only assume that this is mainly due to market share and the need to keep it secure.
If so, they run the risk of falling into the XP trap. Ditch 3.6 now and push for a FF5 update for all, otherwise you'll have 3.6 hanging around for an eternity and potentially pulling an IE6 stunt further down the road with the "it does what I want, why upgrade" brigade...
It would be easier to scan your MP3 collection for what you know is legitimate. That giant stash of CDs sat in your attic gathering dust and your memory is the best way for you to determine what you own, rather than have a program scan for what might be ripped using what, bitrates and dodgy tags as a guide?
But only 30? They must be utterly shit hot at everything if there are so few of them. Even Bletchley Park had hundreds of geeks working for them in WWII.
I mean seriously, if I was putting together a 'cyber warfare' team, it would be the most Badass Dirty Dozen unconventionally styled team based on experience, knowledge and skillsets. If they've done something daft like stuck these 30-odd people on a 'cyber warfarepresuming course', they've already failed.