Catch up on stories from the past week (and beyond) at the Slashdot story archive


Forgot your password?

Slashdot videos: Now with more Slashdot!

  • View

  • Discuss

  • Share

We've improved Slashdot's video section; now you can view our video interviews, product close-ups and site visits with all the usual Slashdot options to comment, share, etc. No more walled garden! It's a work in progress -- we hope you'll check it out (Learn more about the recent updates).


Comment: Best to get started (Score 3, Informative) 228

by Anthracene (#43099549) Attached to: Ask Slashdot: Advice For Summer Before Ph.D. Program?

Move to your new university and use the summer to do (at least one) research rotation.

Here's why: you said "for the next 5 years." I'm not sure where you got that time period from, but if you're doing your PhD in the US, you're going to find that it's a completely open ended process. This is *really* important to internalize, because every other form of education that you've had experience with has a fixed term: you do what they tell you to for the prescribed time period and at the end they hand you the diploma. You can't run down the clock on a PhD. You don't graduate until you can convince your advisor that you've done enough to merit the degree. And it's generally against your advisor's personal interests to let you graduate.

So, if you want to complete your degree in a reasonable period of time (e.g. 5 years), you have two tasks: 1) Find a lab with a research advisor who you like and trust, because you're putting your life in his or her hands. If you wouldn't give him/her copies of your keys and your ATM PIN, you shouldn't be in that lab. 2) Get established in that lab so you can start organizing and taking charge of your own project and working toward first-author publications.

The first step towards this is doing lab rotations. Summer is often a good time to do these, because your first year is likely to be filled up with classes which will make it difficult to spend enough time in a lab to really get a feel for it. Just make sure that the PI in whichever lab you're rotating in is going to be around (sometimes they are gone for months at a time in the summer) because the most important thing you need to get out of the rotation is deciding whether you trust the PI.

I suspect there will be several threads of people recommending various voyages of self-discovery or self-education. If you had something that you really *wanted* to do, I wouldn't try to talk you out of it, but from the way you've phrased your question it doesn't really sound like there is, and there's no point finding a new hobby this summer that you won't have time to continue once you start your program.

Best of luck with your program.

Comment: Re:Med School (Score 1) 454

by Anthracene (#41678103) Attached to: Faculty To Grad Students: Go Work 80-Hour Weeks!

As a current resident, I feel obligated to point out that there have actually been some real improvements in the past 10 years on resident work hours. The most important ones being:
* No more than 80 hours worked in a week (Many surgery residencies previously averaged up to 100.)
* No more than 30 hours in a row (Previously 36 was the standard; 48 was not unheard of.)
* 4 days completely off out of every 4 weeks.
There are some loopholes (e.g. you can stretch the 80 hours to 88 if the time is categorized creatively) and abuses (some programs encourage their residents to under-report time), but I think it's generally a big step in the right direction for patient safety and resident quality of life.
Something to think about: These rules only apply to residents, who are always supervised to at least some extent. They don't apply to attendings (fully boarded doctors). So you won't be treated by a resident who hasn't slept in 72 hours, but if you're in a non-teaching hospital it's still possible that the non-resident doctor treating you there hasn't slept in 72 hours.

Comment: Re:Not very (Score 3, Interesting) 160

by Anthracene (#22255174) Attached to: A Torrid Tale of Plagiarizing Paleontologists
I have (as far as I know) never been maliciously plagiarized, but I have been surprised at how many times I've been plagiarized by papers that cite my own. Clearly, they're not trying to hide anything, or they wouldn't have bothered to cite the paper that they're copying from, but there seem to be many authors who don't see anything wrong with lifting a paragraph and just changing a couple words. Certainly the few I've contacted about doing this have seemed very surprised that I should think there's anything wrong with it. Obviously this kind of thing isn't as serious as what's being alleged in TFA, since none of them were claiming credit for my ideas or work, but I think it is a point along the continuum of laziness and dishonesty of grabbing something that's someone else's rather than doing it yourself.

You are false data.