Forgot your password?

typodupeerror

Comment: Re:Do NOT try to suppress it. (Score 2) 199

by Annirak (#38185248) Attached to: Huge Tesla Coils Will Recreate Natural Lightning

This is a TERRIBLE source of renewable energy. Lightning is a pulsed power source, where our demands are essentially steady. Lightning is caused either by wind or solar wind (charged particles accumulating in the atmosphere), so why not pick that up directly? We have wind turbines and solar cells. These are far more sensible than lightning as a power source.

And for reference, wind power is effectively solar, since wind is cause by uneven absorption of solar radiation, which causes convection currents.

Comment: Re:WTF? (Score 1) 294

by Annirak (#37071140) Attached to: US Energy Panel Cautiously Endorses Fracking

Just a point to note: tidal power is a waste of time. The power density available from a perfect tidal pool is about 2% of an equivalent solar array. (This assumes the world's highest tides, but only 600W/m^2 available power for half of the day on average).

In terms of land utilization, we should never endorse tidal power.

Comment: What about secondary interference points? (Score 2) 91

by Annirak (#36991336) Attached to: Harnessing Interference For Faster Wireless Data

Waves don't only interfere constructively at one point. They interfere constructively at many points, to varying degrees. What happens when two devices are using mirrored interference points?

Instead of targeting specific devices, what about dividing the landscape into many physical regions, using constructive interference to cover an area rather than a single device. It would be like space-division multiplexing.

My biggest concern with this tech is not transmission from towers to individual devices, but rather the return call. What are the computational requirements for a receiver using this technology?

I fear explanations explanatory of things explained.

Working...