I read it and it actually illustrates the need for the reverse-ism rule perfectly.
I'll get modded into oblivion fit this, but I'll try to explain. Some people like to scream racism and sexism when others suggest that they want to help a particular disadvantaged group. Many of the comments saying this don't even make sense. They claim that the reverse-ism rules make it okay to harass white males, but that's clearly not what they say and would break the "no harassment" rule anyway.
Some groups have less privilege than others. That's just how the world is. White, straight, cis males are lucky because they benefited from the greatest affirmative action programme in the history of the world. It's called the history of the world.
There is also the fact that doing stuff that helps say women get on in tech is not sexist unless it is to the detriment if men, and vice versa. Don't mistake criticism of Men's Rights Activists for a double standard. Those guys are asshats, that's why they are criticised. The argument that we should do nothing that isn't entirely gender and race and orientation neutral is itself sexist and racist, because it denies the problems that exist. Just saying "there is no problem now" does not fix anything. If it did car mechanics would be out of business.