Follow Slashdot blog updates by subscribing to our blog RSS feed

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Slashdot videos: Now with more Slashdot!

  • View

  • Discuss

  • Share

We've improved Slashdot's video section; now you can view our video interviews, product close-ups and site visits with all the usual Slashdot options to comment, share, etc. No more walled garden! It's a work in progress -- we hope you'll check it out (Learn more about the recent updates).

×

Comment: Re:I agree (Score 1) 596

by AmericanInKiev (#35094094) Attached to: Microsoft Vehemently Denies Google's "Bing Sting"

I think we're missing the bigger picture.
Google started with nothing and said, how can we make sense of the Web as Observers - they invented "Linking".
Microsoft started with the #1 Browser (or whatever) and said how can /we/ make sense of the web, and they said "clicking and sticking".
This is information Google didn't have, but they built a browser to get it because they understood Microsoft's advantage.

To leverage its browser advantage, MS needs a syntax which connects a term searched to results pages. It would naturally code all the available search engines as the natural source of this relationship. It is less interested in the list of results, than it is in the clicked-through link; and MS would argue there's a difference, while GOOG would argue that it picks the candidates, thus MS is leaching.

In response, GOOG will likely engage in very heavy duty "testing" of this theory by designing proxy servers which reports consistently misleading results for more and more search terms.

... though his invention worked superbly -- his theory was a crock of sewage from beginning to end. -- Vernor Vinge, "The Peace War"

Working...