Please create an account to participate in the Slashdot moderation system

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
What's the story with these ads on Slashdot? Check out our new blog post to find out. ×

Comment Re:One overlooked option... (Score 1) 267

No argument there if you wish to spawn on access, or just use a frozen image with COW.

However, you failed to read, or at least quote the one line that makes this relatively possible...

It sounds as if this is intended to be on an "infrequent" and "exception" basis.

In other words, allow them to do what they need to do, up to the point it becomes a risk, and then step in. I mean, really, if you have people with a legitimate need to download that much to do their jobs, is it not possible that you may have a poorly spec'd image for your systems?

Comment One overlooked option... (Score 2) 267

So far it seems everyone is trying to bring "open internet" to the users computer... why?

It sounds as if this is intended to be on an "infrequent" and "exception" basis.

Deploy a terminal server in a DMZ, users can then remote in and browse from there. If you want to allow open downloading, provide a restricted AV protected share to retrieve downloaded files, if you do not want to allow open downloading, provide one anyways but require an IT person to review it manually.
Reimage nightly if paranoid.

Comment Re:Thought process (Score 5, Informative) 227

let me know the next time Google wires up a violence plagued ghetto somewhere.

https://fiber.google.com/citie...
Oh trust me... there are plenty...

Also, I believe the city had some say in where they started, and in what order zoning/permitting was/is being approved.

Now if you want to go and say they are cherry picking markets as in those where it will do well (big cities), let me show you every commercially available communications advance (POTS with > 28.8, DSLAMs, ISDN, Cell Service, 4G, Cable, Broadband)

Comment Re:Blender should take them to court (Score 2) 306

Please note that under Section 512(f) any person who knowingly materially misrepresents that material or activity is infringing may be subject to liability for damages. Where YouTube has a good faith belief that a person is materially misrepresenting that material or activity is infringing of their rights or the right of a copyright owner for whom they are authorized to act, YouTube may, in its discretion, not remove the cited content. In this case, we will notify the complainant.

I hope to see a Defamation/Libel case coming to a court room near you!

Comment Re:Anything that states it has to be free? (Score 1) 351

If you had not posted as AC I may have given this response more effort.
No reveling here, just a responsible attitude. How much does Google make off of 1 .de user on average, how many emails from annoying entitled freeloaders do they get from .de and what is the cost to handle it all?

Are you saying to take into account the costs is not a valid thought process?

Comment Re:Well... (Score 2) 351

Downside to that is the law applies to all German companies, not just business who publish under .de domains.
Additionally it is about Consumers, so one could say you register in the US, but the company has a presence and users in .XX then you have to deal with the laws that cover .XX's users even if they are not paying for it as a .XX user.

Comment Anything that states it has to be free? (Score 1) 351

Simple solution for Google, claim it as a business loss or start charging for it.

Want a personal reply? Open a Google wallet, €1.75 per email and you get your personal response.
Can't charge for it? Any costs associated with complying, go ahead and bill it against the corporation formed in Germany. Once it starts having net losses then close it down and forward the .de domain to somewhere else. Then the only page you publish is a redirect header. Easy to support with 100% accuracy any time in an automated email reply.

Comment Why spread the data around? (Score 5, Insightful) 93

Ok, Google has it...

They said they will destroy it, either they do or they don't, it doesn't matter because they will do what they choose. But why go handing a copy over to every state who asks for it?

Really, if you're concerned about privacy, you want this information in the LEAST number of hands possible.

Transportation

Inventor Demonstrates Infinitely Variable Transmission 609

ElectricSteve writes with this excerpt from Gizmag: "Ready for a bit of a mental mechanical challenge? Try your hand at understanding how the D-Drive works. Steve Durnin's ingenious new gearbox design is infinitely variable — that is, with your motor running at a constant speed, the D-Drive transmission can smoothly transition from top gear all the way through neutral and into reverse. It doesn't need a clutch, it doesn't use any friction drive components, and the power is always transmitted through strong, reliable gear teeth. In fact, it's a potential revolution in transmission technology."

Comment Re:Did they try to work it out or just FILE FILE F (Score 2, Interesting) 183

From the original complaint, the USPS apparently does treat them differently as far as machine handling... it would be interesting to see what happens.

The issue here is why does GameFly have to jump through hoops and spend alot more on packaging to survive automation even when the class of service they used allows for non-machine sorts, while the other companies get separated for special treatment.

Comment Did they try to work it out or just FILE FILE FILE (Score 3, Insightful) 183

Alot of the questions go to what effort did GameFly invest into research, planning and execution, of the shipping and return process.
Things from the material the mailer is produced from to simply how the dvd is secured inside the envelope to prevent shifting through the sorting process.

And the really big question, are you sure they really were "stolen" and not just kept.

I think pretty much all of the questions are valid and while written in legaleze, quite understandable given the severity of the complaint. If GameFly worked with the USPS in planning the mailing portion of their service and co-operated in tracking down these "thefts" before filing this case, then they should have no problems answering every one of them honestly and fully.

You are false data.

Working...