Are you trying to suggest that x64 versions of Vista aren't in regular use by regular people?

If this is your feeling, then you should know it's wholly inaccurate.

I've been running Vista Pro x64 on my HP laptop (my primary work box, as a developer and business owner) for ~2 years now, and I have everything on it.

It's my primary desktop for both work and personal life.

It's been nearly flawless after SP1, and is worlds better than XP was. Mind you, it's a stacked laptop, or at least was 2 years ago when I bought it (dual core 2.4, 4gb, 7200rpm, 512mb nvidia graphics card).

Maybe you were suggesting something else though, it was hard to tell.

All that fear mongering was a bunch of hooey.

Nothing.

Yes

Vista and W7 are much more thoroughly instrumented than XP was. Many of these will send anonymous usage and config data back to MS. These are all well documented and understood, and don't really cause any concern for privacy.

They're largely all disable-able, though they are scattered, as many of the product groups rolled their own systems for this (ie, office vs. media player vs wga, etc).

This is dependent on the hardware and software you use. But the OS in no way gets involved.

Loaded question. UAC on Vista (post SP1) worked exactly as it was intended. Any problems you had you should blame on your app vendors.

Or yourself, if you chose to not customize UAC behavior to your liking. It is tremendously customizable (even in Vista) in how it behaves, how it prompts, whether or not to use the secure desktop, etc etc. If you don't like it, just configure it so that you do.

W7 loosens it a bit so that many actions that the OS perceives as 'initiated by the user' dont cause an elevation. This is how it ships. You can turn it back to Vista style if you want, or otherwise customize it.

Yes.

3 Cables? How do you figure that.

Looking at mine:

1 x power
1 x ethernet
1 x speakers
1 x keyboard
1 x mouse
2 x external displays

I know not everyone is going to have 2 external displays, but even without, that's still 6 cables you have to plug and unplug every single time you come or go from the office.

The reason people say you need docking stations at work is that most folks can't do real 8-10 hours on the computer using tiny cramped keyboards and tiny cramped displays that are all in the wrong location from each other.

It's okay for a couple hours in meetings or sitting in Starbucks, but for real developer work you need a real full size keyboard, a real external mouse, a real 22" or larger display (at least one).

Not to mention that because Mac's lack docking stations, you can never have more than one external display.

HP makes phenomenal laptops, but you have to make sure you're buying corporate kit, and not consumer level stuff.

Basically, if you're buying it from a physical retail store, you're buying consumer garbage.

The prior generation, the ones with the 'Compaq' label and otherwise just numbers were excellent.

The new ones are the Elitebooks (IIRC) and are quite amazing.

Not cheap though.

They're marketed as Engineering Workstation Laptops. My HP Compaq 8710w has treated me well for a couple years now, and has been nearly indestructible. Might be a bit big/heavy for some folks (17" widescreen, plus I carry the external 12-cell monstro-battery with it so I can work at Starbucks for hours and hours).

Your primary argument for the Mac's seems to be how they look.

Who cares. It's a tool.

And there are a number of aluminum chassis laptops with backlit keyboards and nearly all the stuff you want. Most of the mainstream corp kit is that nowadays.

It's arguable that the Macs are slightly better made from a physical standpoint. But there are some very nice non-apple laptops out there.

The HP Compaq stuff (Elitebook 17" for example), or the Dell Latitude E's, or the Lenovo.

Lastly, you're right in that when it was owned by IBM, the Thinkpad's were the best. That margin is pretty much non-existent now under Lenovo. The rest of the manufacturers have caught up.

Right now I'm using an HP Compaq 8710w, and this thing is a workhorse. It gets abused and just keeps on going. It's black, and dirty, because I'm a man and I don't give a rat's hairy ass how it looks.

Again, I'm a man, so I could care less about size and weight, within reason. With other equipment, books, and magazines in my laptop bag, the bag approaches 30 pounds at times anyway, so the couple pounds of the laptop is irrelevant.

Where do you plug the second external monitor into?

I dont recall that I've ever seen a Mac with a dual-density (or whatever it's called this year) dvi port on the laptop chassis.

That's ridiculous.

A typical power user on a laptop (like a developer) has the following:

1 x power
1 x ethernet
1 x speakers
1 x keyboard
1 x mouse
1or2 x external displays

I know not everyone is going to have 2 external displays, but even without, that's 6 cables to plug in. You can reduce it by one if you use a USB hub.

Plus most laptops dont have dual-density DVI ports (that support two 1920x1200 external displays) on them, only on the docking station.

That is a completely absurd statement.

My docking station has 7 wires running out of it. Without the docking station, I would have to connect and disconnect all 7 of those wires every time (multiple times per day) that I arrive at or leave from the office.

There isn't a laptop on earth whose keyboard can match my MS Natural, or a proper optical mouse. Not to mention the 24" screens and real speakers.

Generally the only people who can use the laptop full time without external keyboard/mouse/displays are lightweight users, people who only use it a couple hours per day.

This is incorrect, or at least, not globally correct.

When you have an LLC, you have a choice on how its taxed.

You can trivially have an LLC that is taxed as a corp, and the owners are not subject to any pass-through or self-employment tax.

My business is setup that way, and its fairly common. Many LLC's start out small, with pass-through taxing, and then go the corp-taxed route when they get big enough for it to make sense.

Actually, that _always_ works, at least with mainstream raid controllers.

RAID-1 mirroring (and only RAID-1 mirroring) does not write the data in a proprietary format on the drive. The only difference between a mirrored drive and a regular drive is that most decent RAID controllers will write the volume configuration to every drive as well.

Now, what you say is absolutely true when dealing with any other raid type.

Note that there may be odd or really crappy controllers that do use a proprietary format for RAID-1, but thats not the case for all the mainstream cards used in intel servers.