Catch up on stories from the past week (and beyond) at the Slashdot story archive


Forgot your password?

Slashdot videos: Now with more Slashdot!

  • View

  • Discuss

  • Share

We've improved Slashdot's video section; now you can view our video interviews, product close-ups and site visits with all the usual Slashdot options to comment, share, etc. No more walled garden! It's a work in progress -- we hope you'll check it out (Learn more about the recent updates).

User Journal

Journal: I'll show you the "strongest terms"

Journal by Alibaba10100
The latest non-action taken by a world leader on Zimbabwe is by far the most useless. Condoleezza Rice has now explained that the US condemns Mugabe's government "in the strongest terms". In other words, not only can she not be bothered to do anything, she can't even bother to actually say anything. Instead, Condi is notifying you that if she did say something, she'd use some really strong terms. Well, Mugabe should consider himself condemned. She's going to condemn him so bad he'll have to lock himself in his room and cry for a couple hours just to get over it. What is this "in the strongest terms" bullshit? I did a little web research trying to find if I got it wrong, if that actually does mean something. If, perhaps it uses some other definition of "term". I found nothing but a bunch of worthless organizations trying to express their distaste for something without even saying anything. Here's another great bit from that story. Zimbabwe's election commission chair defended the elections saying "Some people can also describe an election held in Iraq as free and fair depending on how you evaluate". Talk about playing up the crowd! Robert Mugabe may be a terrible, murderous bastard but hey, at least he's not George Bush. The worst thing is imagining someone nodding in agreement as they read that. Disgusting.

When you don't know what to do, walk fast and look worried.