An anonymous reader writes "Another story about some free product or service that is ad-supported is making the rounds (google for "peter gabriel" and "we7" in case you missed it), but I am wondering ... ... the ads are payed for by companies whose products "we" buy (or are supposed to buy), so effectively by "our" money, only that we did not explicitly choose to put "our" money there!
So how free is free, if for everything that we buy there's an "ad tax" that we pay that goes towards paying everything ad-supported? Wouldn't everything be much cheaper if without the ad-tax that, in addition to paying for everything ad-supported, must also pay the advertising industry?
But the ad industry has probably done a good job of presenting itself as oil, rather than sand, in the cogworks of our economy ... although us community of all consumers feeding the ad-industry through the ad-tax on nearly everything that we buy seems to me like a communist-style solidarity, a sharing inmidst the otherwise egoistical capitalism. We could of course also call it vampirism?"