Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment: IE8 is on top for 2 reasons.... (Score 1) 319

by Afrosheen (#30991614) Attached to: IE 8 Is Top Browser, Google Chrome Is Rising Fast

I'm surprised nobody has caught the obvious here, that IE8 is gaining ground thanks to a two-pronged strategy. The first is Microsoft pushing IE8 out forcefully to everyone via windows/microsoft update. Even on the server side of things. They rank it as a critical download rather than optional, so if you just have important updates turned on, it will show up all by itself eventually. The second is that Windows 7 and Server 2008 are both gaining momentum as people buy new stuff and companies begin to upgrade their infrastructures. It's a new year which means a new budget and money to spend on replacing dead or dying computers and servers.

All this results in IE8 gaining marketshare. It will end up capturing as much, if not more, of IE7's share over time. There may always be some old holdouts from companies running some crazy in-house web-based app that only works on IE6, but I'm sure there are still NT4 boxen humming away in some dusty server closets somewhere too.

My only beef with IE8 is how the rendering engine destroys some pages. Buttons don't appear, images and text gets cut off, and I'll be damned if the page printing feature doesn't still chop the sides off of pages rather than reformat them to fit the page for printing. MS releases "compatibility" updates for it nearly every week or two, just to get it to render as cleanly (which is relative at this point) as IE7. At many companies I take care of, I have intentionally disabled IE8 from WSUS and unchecked it from Windows Update using the "fuck you don't come back" button due to rendering problems that end up crippling some work-related sites.

Maggots Rid Patients Of Antibiotic-resistant Infection, MRSA->

From feed by sdfeed
Medical researchers are ridding diabetic patients of the superbug MRSA -- by treating their foot ulcers with maggots. The scientists used green bottle fly larvae to treat 13 diabetic patients whose foot ulcers were contaminated with MRSA and found all but one were cured within a mean period of three weeks, much quicker than the 28-week duration for the conventional treatment.
Link to Original Source
Unix

+ - Define: /etc

Submitted by ogar572
ogar572 (531320) writes "There has been an ongoing and heated debate around the office concerning the definition of what /etc means on *nix operating systems. One side says "et cetera" per Wikipedia. Another side says it means "extended tool chest" per this gnome mailing list entry or per this Norwegian article. Yet another side says neither, but he doesn't remember exactly what he heard in the past. All he remembers is that he was flamed when he called it "et cetera", but that "extended tool chest" didn't sound right either. So, what does it really mean?"
Communications

+ - Blackberry-style smartphone runs Linux

Submitted by
An anonymous reader writes "Looks like the Research-in-Motion (RIM) Blackberry and Palm Treo are no longer the only smartphones with full hardware keyboards and "push" email. Dutch consumer electronics giant Grundig has come out with a B700 mobile communicator, a quad-band EDGE phone with a nice sleek design and lots of Linux-based multimedia and messaging goodness."
Announcements

+ - The world's most anti-reflective coating

Submitted by
Roland Piquepaille
Roland Piquepaille writes "Researchers from the Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute (RPI) have created a material that reflects virtually no light — or absorbs it like a black hole. They've built this new material by stacking layers of 'silica nanorods.' And they reached a refractive index of 1.05. This can be compared with 1.0 for air or 2.4 for diamonds. This coating, which is effective for all wavelengths, could be used for brighter light-emitting diodes (LEDs), more efficient solar cells, and new classes of 'smart' light sources that adjust to their environments. But don't expect to see your next glasses or the windshields of your cars protected with this coating: it's too sensitive to water and it would be destroyed by rain. Here is a link to more details and references about this anti-reflective coating."
NASA

+ - Virtual Black Hole

Submitted by
mounce
mounce writes "NSF News reports a new coating that virtually captures all light and prevents reflection. I heard that NASA spent a lot on developing this type of reflective coating in the 1980's (history clarification, please?), and only managed to about break-even with what you can get in the soot deposited from a burning candle. Why? The soot, which is known as "carbon black," looks like a bunch of tiny fingers when you view them up-close (you might say they are natural carbon nanotubes) which is what the NASA engineers tried to duplicate. Now comes-along Jong Kyu Kim and a team from Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, working with National Science Foundation-supported electrical engineer Fred Schubert, using a common silica deposit process to grow ranks of nanoscale rods that look like piles of shag carpet. This high surface-to-volume ratio makes a good pigment, of course, but can also be used to conduct heat, and the authors believe it will be useful for transferring energy in developing solar cells. I think NASA originally wanted the Right Stuff for the ultimate sunglasses. The article was published in the 1 March 2007 issue of Nature Photonics NSF News Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute Fred Schubert Nature Photonics"
Role Playing (Games)

+ - No more FoxTrot daily comic strips; WoW to blame?

Submitted by Philaretus
Philaretus (255379) writes "A press release at the Universal Press Syndicate is announcing that Bill Amend will cease production of daily FoxTrot comic strips, long popular in the nerd community. Amend "is taking time to pursue other creative outlets." But in other news, Bill discusses being hooked on World of Warcraft. Coincidence? I don't think so! Says Amend: "Seriously, it's a full-time job just getting my strips out the door each week. And Warcraft doesn't help.""
PlayStation (Games)

+ - Sony plays off failed advertising campaign.

Submitted by
kinglink
kinglink writes "Sony's site has finally admitted to being a shill for the site. Sony's response to the public is to shrug it off and act like there was no problem. "Busted. Nailed. Snagged. As many of you have figured out (maybe our speech was a little too funky fresh???), Peter isn't a real hip-hop maven and this site was actually developed by Sony. Guess we were trying to be just a little too clever. From this point forward, we will just stick to making cool products, and use this site to give you nothing but the facts on the PSP.""
Programming

+ - Review of "The Art of C++"

Submitted by
scottsk
scottsk writes "THE ART OF C++
by Herbert Schildt
Osborne, 2004
0-07-225512-9
$39.99

I had seen some of Schildt's material in the early 90s, and had
recently found a copy of his original "Turbo C: The Complete
Reference" book because I was working with Turbo C 1.0 and 1.5 for
historical research. But what was Schildt up to now? I found a chapter
on garbage collection in C++ which looked really interesting, and
bought "The Art of C++" very cheaply because it's no longer in print
even though it is from 2004. I've been looking through it, trying to
brush up on both C and C++. The bottom line is, there's some good
stuff in this book, but some bad stuff too. It's probably worth what a
used copy would sell for to get the garbage collection chapter. Many
of Schildt's books have a quote about his material being "first-rate",
but much in this book is second-rate, as I'll explain when I get into
the individual chapters.

The goal of the book is to demonstrate the "Art" of C++ (does the
title echo Knuth on purpose?) by showing the artistry with which the
language can be used to craft elegant solutions. The book's chapters
are hands-on projects the novice can build to get some experience with
the language. It's by no means a professional programming book, but
not aimed at the rank novice, either. Because the book is a grab-bag
of extremely varied projects, there's probably something in here for
almost anyone. You're assumed to have some facility with your C++
compiler, editor, etc; and to know the basics about the
language. There are two chapters (multithreading and the Internet file
downloader) which are specific to the Windows environment, but the
other chapters could be worked through by anyone with a C++ compiler
(such as g++ on Linux).

Let's look at the chapters!

Chapter one is just a preface masquerading as a chapter. The author
basically could have said "C++ is a powerful language" on the title
page and skipped this. His point is valid, but doesn't require a
chapter to make. C++ allows the programmer to get close to the
machine and write expressive code. I assume anyone buying a
project-oriented book on C++ already knows this. It's curious that,
writing in 2004, the author doesn't even mention why p-code systems
such as the C# CLI and Java's JVM have eclipsed C++. That would be
interesting to examine, since there's got to be some reason people are
going back to the inefficiency of p-code.

Chapter two is the garbage collection chapter, and is actually very
interesting. Schildt uses C++ fully, and does a decent job explaining
how garbage collectors work. I was pleased by this. The explanation is
very simple and straightforward. I've seen garbage collectors in LISP
implementations written in C before, but never fully reverse
engineered them. Unlike LISP versions, this garbage collector is a
reference counter. It's probably not adequate for real-world use, but
it's fascinating to look under the covers of a simple garbage
collector and learn how it works.

Chapter three is about Windows multithreading, which I didn't pay much
attention to since I don't program on Windows. He extends the garbage
collector to run as a separate thread.

Chapter four is interesting. Schildt builds a front-end for C++ so new
language features can be implemented, much like the "cfront" program
added new C++ language features to C. The front-end reads your program
and translates several new features into their C++ equivalents. What's
interesting is that he adds a foreach keyword, but then doesn't extend
it to iterate over STL containers, just built-in arrays, so that's
underwhelming. If it supported STL containers, it would have made this
a killer chapter. Because I don't use C#, I don't understand the
benefits of the "typeof" operator Schildt develops. I thought it was a
cool idea to do to C++ what C++ did to C. The only beef I have is this
front-end is little more than C code. It isn't developed as an
object-oriented program from the ground up, even though it does throw
an exception. Where is the parser factory, and delegation to helper
objects which do the code rewrites, and the design patterns?

Chapter five is about Internet file downloads, which is so 1998. To
develop this program, Schildt uses a Windows high-level API called
WinInet, which I have to guess is a wrapper around the usual socket
functions common to UNIX and Windows. It's certainly easy! Basically
you just have to call about five functions in the right order and it's
all magic. You learn nothing about TCP or UNIX socket calls in this
chapter, so I'm not sure what the point is. Since this is a book on
C++, you would expect to be using the Borland VCL, or maybe MFC, but
the demo program is a Petzold-era Windows program written in C. The
author even includes a manual resource definitions file! Get out your
Petzold book and try to remember how to manually compile a resource
file. I am not very impressed by this chapter, since you don't learn
anything useful!

Chapter six has a bunch of financial formulas from your college
economics book coded in C++. This chapter is totally awful! Every
single formula uses C++'s built-in floating point data type. Surely
you're joking, Mr. Schildt? I expected this chapter to discuss
rounding errors, BCD packages, fixed-point class libraries, and so
on. A guy billed as "a genuine C++ guru" on the cover (it really says
that; I couldn't invent anything that corny) ought to know more about
this. This chapter alone is a good reason to put all copies of this
book in the recycle bin. I hope no one from my bank reads it! The
chapter is so bad I don't even need to get into the fact that the code
isn't very object-oriented.

On to chapter seven, where things get better. This is a chapter on
(very basic) AI based problem solving. Back in 1987, Schildt wrote a
classic book on Borland's Turbo Prolog which included this chapter. He
actually did a commendable job bringing it up to date for this book,
re-writing the examples in C++. What this chapter covers is creating a
decision tree and walking it in different orders. Again, like most of
these chapters, it's really basic, but gives a newcomer to AI a way to
get started before, say, venturing into "Structured Interpretation Of
Computer Programs".

Chapter eight is how to build your own STL container. This is a gentle
chapter, which works through the standard interfaces containers need
to support to interoperate with the standard algorithms and
iterators. I liked this chapter because I find the STL a little
disorienting, and most books (like one I have, "Generic Programming
and the STL") to be almost too detailed for a novice. What he builds
is an array that's indexed from any number, not just zero. This gives
the container a nice, clean implementation (subtract the index from
the base and index a real array) that doesn't get in the way of the
STL stuff.

The final chapter is a Mini-C++ interpreter. Many of us will remember
Little C, Schildt's August 1989 contribution to Dr. Dobb's
Journal. (If not, you can find the original source and article online
if you convince Google you want it badly enough.) This is the same
code! The interpreter is a hand-coded recursive descent parser that
knows a rudimentary form of C. It does not use LEXX and YACC, so it's
actually a fascinating example of how these parsers work. Or, it
was. The trouble is this code has been around for a long time, and is
not even a C++ interpreter. It does not understand classes at
all. What else is there that distinguishes C++ from C? The interpreter
does understand using "cout > var" but not deeply,
it's just syntactic sugar.

If you're too lazy to enter the programs, you can download the source
online from Osborne's site, but a word of warning that the zip file
has a single text file for each chapter with the listings one after
the other, so it's hard to pick each file's source code apart. There
aren't any markers in the file to show you where one file ends and the
other begins. Almost silly to do it this way, since (hopefully) the
code was in separate files during testing!

My feeling at the end of the book was one of being underwhelmed. I
wouldn't waste much time with this book. If you can get it for a
couple of dollars, you might like to see the garbage collection
chapter. Given that the book bills its author as "the world's
number-one programming author" and "a genuine C++ guru", there's not
much to back up these claims.

(If you want to read the garbage collector chapter, see the link to it
on Schildt's Wikipedia entry.)"

Nothing succeeds like success. -- Alexandre Dumas

Working...