Catch up on stories from the past week (and beyond) at the Slashdot story archive

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Slashdot videos: Now with more Slashdot!

  • View

  • Discuss

  • Share

We've improved Slashdot's video section; now you can view our video interviews, product close-ups and site visits with all the usual Slashdot options to comment, share, etc. No more walled garden! It's a work in progress -- we hope you'll check it out (Learn more about the recent updates).

×

Comment: Re:What for? (Score 1) 41

by phantomfive (#49194005) Attached to: Apple, Google, Bringing Low-Pay Support Employees In-House
This is why.

"Google, which has been under rising pressure along with other tech companies to release diversity data"

And here:

"Put simply, Google is not where we want to be when it comes to diversity,"

Now, by in-sourcing their "low-pay employees," they are instantly closer to where they want to be.

Comment: Re:I'm dying of curiousity (Score 1) 147

by phantomfive (#49192159) Attached to: Software Freedom Conservancy Funds GPL Suit Against VMWare

All interfaces 'literally use the code' If calling an interface makes my code a derived work that is very, very bad in a larger sense.

Do you understand that the case of the linux kernel is different than the oracle vs google case? Google literally rewrote all the code from scratch, merely maintaining the APIs. In the case of the Linux kernel, drivers use the actual code written by Linus et al, it's not just using the APIs.

Comment: Re:I'm dying of curiousity (Score 1) 147

by phantomfive (#49191971) Attached to: Software Freedom Conservancy Funds GPL Suit Against VMWare

Old thread. Linus apparently thought header files/interfaces could be copyrighted. He's been shown to be wrong in the USA.

A) If you're talking about Oracle VS Google, The appeals court overruled that

B) It's not just 'using the header files', it's literally using the kernel code, so even if interfaces couldn't be copyrighted, that wouldn't apply here.

Comment: Re:I'm dying of curiousity (Score 1) 147

by phantomfive (#49190263) Attached to: Software Freedom Conservancy Funds GPL Suit Against VMWare
It's 'controversial' because the term 'derivative work' is controversial.

For example, imagine NVidia has a driver for their graphics card, and they decide to port the driver to Linux. Of necessity, they will need to use some Linux kernel code to do so. Would that be a derivative work, or not?

The sooner you make your first 5000 mistakes, the sooner you will be able to correct them. -- Nicolaides

Working...