Forgot your password?

Comment: Re:Wrong priority! (Score 1) 503

by Aethedor (#47482501) Attached to: Russia Prepares For Internet War Over Malaysian Jet

You expect and want the US to stick it's nose into every corner of the world?

It already has been doing that for the last decades.

Don't we have a UN? Can't Europe look after itself?

I'm not say that *only* the US president should be doing something. EVERY world leader should be doing something. If you think that this is only a local incident, you don't understand the situation there and what just has happend.

Comment: Wrong priority! (Score 5, Insightful) 503

by Aethedor (#47481595) Attached to: Russia Prepares For Internet War Over Malaysian Jet

... the priority is investigating whether U.S. citizens were involved.

Seriously, is that really what matters now? What an arrogant *****. What really matters is who did it and why. What's the risk for other planes. If it were the rebels, how did they get their hands on such advanced weaponry. 298 people died. Who they were is something to find out by the airliner company. A president, and specially one from the USA, should really have other things to worry about.

Comment: Re:PHP with Banshee framework (Score 1) 536

Don't focus on a language only. Also look at a good framework. My advice is the Banshee PHP framework. It mainly focuses on security, which is the only important thing these days. I know this will be seen as spam, but do yourself a favor and just take a look at it for 15 minutes.

Comment: It should be dead (Score 1, Insightful) 283

by Aethedor (#47301101) Attached to: Perl Is Undead

Whatever it is now, it should be dead. For the simple reason that Perl allows this kind of code:

$_='while(read+STDIN,$_,2048){$a=29;$b=73;$c=142;$t=255;@t=map{$_%16or$t^=$c^=( $m=(11,10,116,100,11,122,20,100)[$_/16%8])$t^=(72,@z=(64,72,$a^=12*($_%16 -2?0:$m&17)),$b^=$_%64?12:0,@z)[$_%8]}(16..271);if((@a=unx"C*",$_)[20]&48){$h =5;$_=unxb24,join"",@b=map{xB8,unxb8,chr($_^$a[--$h+84])}@ARGV;s/...$/1$&/;$ d=unxV,xb25,$_;$e=256|(ord$b[4])

Comment: SPDY doesn't solve the real issues (Score 3, Insightful) 220

by Aethedor (#47097495) Attached to: PHK: HTTP 2.0 Should Be Scrapped

The biggest problem with SPDY is that it's a protocol by Google, for Google. Unless you are doing the same as Google, you won't benefit from it. In my free time, I'm writing an open source webserver and by doing so, I've encountered several bad things in the HTTP and CGI standard. Things can be made really more easy and thus faster if we, for example, agree to let go of this rediculous pathinfo, agree that requests within the same connection are always for the same host and make the CGI headers work better with HTTP.

You want things to be faster? Start by making things more simple. Just take a look at all the modules for Apache. The amount of crap many web developers want to put into their website can't be fixed by a new HTTP protocol.

We don't need HTTP/2.0. HTTP/1.3 with some things removed, fixed or at least have some vague things be specified more clearly, would be more than enough for 95% of all the websites.

Comment: Re: Sounds like IT incompetence (Score 1, Interesting) 564

Your story isn't about you messing up. It's about your boss failing hard at proper risk management. He's the one who should be fired for allowing a process in the company in which one person could do so much damage. Unfortunately, this happens still too often. Companies in which the mistake of one single person, the error of one single machine or the failure of one single process starts a chain reaction which causes heavy damage. Just take a look a look at the company you work for. I'm sure everybody can point out a machine or a person that will cause serious problems if that machine or person is not available for a certain amount of time.

Comment: PolarSSL (Score 1) 304

by Aethedor (#46759337) Attached to: OpenBSD Team Cleaning Up OpenSSL
Maybe it's time to realize that OpenSSL has become obsolute. For me it's totally unacceptable that even now the documentation is [STILL INCOMPLETE]. Instead of wasting time with cleaning up a pile of dirt, use that time to start supporting PolarSSL in all your applications. Its code is clean and it is well documented. Once you give PolarSSL a try, I'm sure you will wonder why the hell you were using OpenSSL all that time.

You can do more with a kind word and a gun than with just a kind word. - Al Capone