Follow Slashdot blog updates by subscribing to our blog RSS feed


Forgot your password?

Comment Re:Keep it simple (Score 1) 479

Honestly, as a last resort, it's not a bad idea. I have a fair amount of ESD test gear at work, including a bunch of static discharge guns and the like that can be dialed up to some crazy levels. I was once stuck in a situation much as you - they controlled the modem/router and it was crapping out every few hours, and they were the only game in town for non-dialup access (this was 15ish years ago). I'd already replaced it with a spare that did not have the issue, but since it wasn't provisioned, the only place I could go was their internal pages.

I spent probably two hours going through L1 support, L2 support, and then had them tell me that "oh, sometimes the boxes just do that". So I took the box to work, fried the shit out of it, plugged it back in to let it power up and do real damage to itself now that half the fet gates were probably cooked, and then called them back to tell them that the box had finally crapped out and started smoking. They promptly sent me a new one, and told me "must have been lightning or some sort of power surge."

Yup, a power surge indeed.

Ha, been there. Interesting what a Tesla coil vacuum leak detector will do to some electronics.

Comment Re:Apples to oranges (Score 1) 259

If anyone would sell me a small reactor (e.g. from a sub or whatever), I'd be more than happy to install it in my back yard.

I'm curious - how big do you think submarine reactors are? And how big is your backyard?

A couple of useful hints, by the by:

1) a naval nuclear reactor is bigger than your house.

2) they require an ocean to provide cooling water for the system. Though they could probably manage with a decent sized lake or small river.

3) One man can't operate a naval nuclear reactor.

4) One house can't use the electricity they produce.

Hey, hey, you are being a little unfair here. I understand the nuclear reactor for the U.S. Navy's NR-1 is about the size of a garbage can.

Comment Wow they might find a new particle (or not) (Score -1, Troll) 89

So far they are just looking, and some models predict new particles, but there are no guarantees. Boy the particle physicists would be let down if they don't find anything new. I would be harder to justify building a new bigger more powerful accelerator.

Comment Beer's law in chemistry (Score 1) 73

I remember discussing Beer's Law in chemistry over a few. You have a fine line between more creativity and where the extinction coefficient takes over and you blotto. A couple does help the conversation and helps people that are reserved share their ideas and help stimulate more discussion. So I do think it helps group creativity. (Oh you mean drinking?)

Comment We may hear from Philae later (Score 4, Interesting) 337

While the main battery is nearly depleted and at this point there is not enough solar power striking the solar panels to boot it back up, as the comet approaches the sun the light intensity should go up. We can hope that the existing conditions provide enough power to prevent damage to the landers electronics. Then as the comet approaches the sun and the comet either changes origination to provide more light or just Philae get more intense light it may rise again. That would be grand!

Comment No audio involved obviously (Score 1) 358

Since audio can always be picked up, and so pirated, this must not involve audio. It must be a new Apple technology where the music is "beamed" into your body. This will be a whole new experience and we will need to upgrade all our music and Apple devices to experience it. Get in line now. Here is all my money, how many can I buy....

Comment Past all the NATed machines. hmm (Score 3, Insightful) 267

While I am sure this is a project that will earn millions of dollars for some companies and promotions for individuals, I am not sure how successful you can be at mapping everything. I would imagine more than half of the Internet is hidden behind various NAT boxes. Even with the help of folks like Comcast, CenturyLink, Verizon, AT&T, and the rest of our friends who might help the NSA and GCHQ; we still have businesses, colleges and universities, and most households with most of their computers hidden behind NAT. Maybe when IPv6 becomes ubiquitous it might be possible. I agree with a earlier post too much data, no enough content.