Comment: Re:Yes, you can do that. (Score 2) 968
Frankly, I'd rather have the on-demand stuff over the internet without all sorts of strings attached. I'll happily pay to for on-demand HBO if I can watch it from within XBMC without having to install windows. Untill that happens Sabnzbd + XBMC is simply far more convenient then any legal option.
Comment: Re:Just remember (Score 3, Insightful) 402
Cultural issues exist when outsourcing closer to home as well though, I once freaked a French customer because I was arguing so technical issue with a college and they thought we hated each other
Comment: Re:Autobahn (Score 2) 348
Comment: Re:Raspberry (Score 2) 217
Comment: Re:@ISS (Score 2) 67
Comment: Re:You're a douche (Score 1) 506
You're dead wrong. Microsoft barely exists ouside the desktop and some AD/Exchange setups.
Sure, because Azure doesn't exist, nobody uses IIS for large website, nobody uses Dynamics and no big software vendor develops using Microsoft technology.
There's a reason MS is as big as it is, people and companies use their stuff. They may not be the biggest player in every market, but they are by no means insignificant.
Comment: Re:If selling is legal.. (Score 4, Informative) 281
Comment: Re:I'm Dutch. (Score 4, Insightful) 156
Comment: Re:Awesome (Score 2) 156
Obviously they still won't be able to get actors as talented as Shia LaBeouf to play the roles...
Well, in a world without huge blockbusters he's likely to be looking for a job
Comment: Re:in other words... (Score 2) 156
The other providers were not mentioned in the court order and so they decide not to implement the block unless ordered by court...
Well, at least they will way to see how the appeal works out before they start blocking anything. There's a fair change this ruling is reversed in the appeal in which case implementing a block right now is simply a waste of time for the other providers. But if the order sticks in the appeal I expect other providers to implement the block as well. If they don't they will be sued and loose as well, there's no point in going to court when there is clear jurisprudence.
Comment: Re:Arrested for knowledge? WTF? (Score 1) 741
Six of one, half a dozen of the other though. Maybe somewhat Minority Report-ish, but what if he actually WAS planning on trying to make a bomb? Why should we wait until this person has actually killed potentially hundreds of people with a bomb or some similar device or act before acting against him?
You watch him, to prevent whatever crime he might be planning. Why, because you care so much about society that you rather let a criminal go free than punish an innocent man. Innocent util *proven* guilty, that should be the basis of the law. And frankly, I'd rather risk the occasional terrorist attack, they are few and far between (and usually fail), then risk regularly punishing innocent people. If the latter starts happening there will be far more victims...
Having said that, I can live with cases where someone is clearly guilty even though he hasn't done anything yet. Attempted murder is generally considered a crime as well, even when nobody got hurt in the attempt. But it's a tricky business, so it better be really clear and really guilty. As far as I can see this case really doesn't get close to that.