When I submit articles, I summarize them properly. That's why mine have been rejected every time. Even when the same article was accepted by someone else who submitted it later, with a copy-paste of the first two paragraphs.
And your comments about the edges are stupid. THey aren't sharp. The reviews all indicate it's easy to hold. I still don't understand why you are going so far out of your way to make up lies about something. It's a phone, why would you hate it so much? It's just a phone.
You just demonstrate your lack of knowledge on the subject that you misunderstood the summary (which wasn't wrong, though you asserted it was) But don't let lack of knowledge of the subject stop you from asserting your wrong opinion as truth.
Or are you saying that you'd only accept an otterbox? I saw one officially announcing it, but the Edge isn't fully released. So yes, there aren't 10,000 cases for it.
can't use a protective case.
can't be held on both sides
even easier to crack the screen on than a regular smartphone
A lie to go with the other lies you gave.
Why are you bashing something for being different? None of your complaints are even valid, 2/3 disprovable with simple searches.
Reality proves you wrong. If obscene speech was NOT illegal, then Paul Little wouldn't have been convicted of obscenity.
OR are you arguing that reality is wrong because it contradicts your opinion?