Hawk and the crashed Ikon as well. And the large CHA carved into the moon.

I have a psychology degree. The one constant in the program was that everyone interested in psychology was interested in it to find out why they were so fuck in the head, and none had an interest in finding out why others were or helping them. Of course, I was the only exception. It was a recommended partner for computer engineering, for both UI and AI applications.

And does that conflict exist when police are testifying against people they arrested/cited? It seems to me that this is a "they came for the speeders, and I didn't speak up" situation. You get what you deserve. Oh, and I did speak up when they came for the speeders. I have victories in court and letters to politicians as evidence of that. But the "men" in question don't have any issue with police being taken as infalible, unless it's used against them. That makes them part of the problem, and so I have no sympathy.

As my father was abusive and my mother never mentioned such a thing in court, I think I have an insight you lack. She never mentioned it. There was no need to, he knew it would be used against him, and so he didn't oppose her custody demands (didn't hurt that the children were of age where in a contested custody the children would be asked who they'd rather go with, and the children would have not picked him). So the one case I have intimate knowledge of, he was a abuser (alcoholic) and it was never mentioned. And my mother worked for Family Court Services (the local organization that would testify in court as to which parent was most suitable in a custody dispute, as well as adoption assessments) so she'd go in assuming everyone was lying to make themselves look good. There were false claims from both sides in almost every case of a dispute, and false claims with no evidence work against the liar in court.

And how many is that. 1% of the accused? 10%? 150%?

US is one as well, but only in the requirement that the person born abroad must have spent at least one day in the US for citizenship to be conferred on their children (and we've satisfied that for the one born abroad so far, so our children's children will have dual citizenship on birth - triple if we manage to collect the next we are aiming for).

The suicide rate at Foxconn is below average, and the conditions above average. Foxconn isn't a blow against Apple, unless you are an ignorant idiot.

Fuck you. You are lying. You are pissed off abuser, or defender of abusers who lies in court and is lying here. I said no such thing. The original statement was that eye witness testimony wasn't "Evidence" I pointed out that was wrong. I didn't say anything about whether it was sufficient for conviction. When you whined that it shouldn't be sufficient, I pointed out that it is considered sufficient in traffic court, and there aren't large groups of pissed off men protesting that. Again, you are wrong on every point you've ever made, and to try to hide that, you are lying about what I said.

Everyone reading this can scroll up and see you are a lying sack of shit. If you wanted to discuss the issue, you'd ask questions and listen. Instead, you want to rant, so you spew non sequiturs and lies to declare victory in your rant. You are what you complain about. The lying wife attacking the non-lying innocent guy. And you have no grasp of the irony, making you not only a liar, but a lying idiot.

My parents met as probation officers, and my mother and sister worked for the state in family law, and my father was a lawyer in family law. So I have an idea of family law. And I have a degree in psychology, so I have a grasp of human nature. So you are a lying idiot that has never been right in his life. But keep guessing, it makes you feel better, and guesses are at least not lies.

I moved from the US to a socialist paradise because I can afford it, and my children are able to pick which of the two they want (collecting citizenships, EU citizenship is next on the list, but England killed their skilled worker program, so I'd have to have a job before I could move to the UK or Spain (the top two on our list for EU, jobs are easier in Germany, but Germany requires renouncing all other citizenships). Once US, EU and Australia are collected and passed on to the children, they could pick almost anywhere English speaking to live.

Circular reasoning? Are you arguing that traffic cops don't get convictions from asserting guilt with no other evidence? Or are you arguing that all the wife-beating men complained about that long before they lost their children, and objected to the evidence standards then, and didn't wait until it affected them before complaining?

Because just mentioning that abusive men would complain isn't circular reasoning. Perhaps you should read your own links before posting them.

That's the cop in traffic court, and I don't see nearly as many complaints about that, as the abusive men who wish they wouldn't have any sanctions against them.

Most of the lighting in my house is DC. 12V halogen MR16 bulbs.