Forgot your password?

typodupeerror

Comment: Re:DRM wins (Score 1) 267

Kindle lets you loan books - if the publisher allows - for a single short period. Get a book loaned to you but something comes up and can't read it in that window? Oh well out of luck!

I think the author has control over that, but I may be mistaken.

This is one that bit me just a few weeks ago. I'd purchased a recent Jonathan Kellerman Kindle book, but wasn't in the mood to read it yet - so I was going to lend it to my wife. Guess what? It wasn't allowed.

This is why, even though it's inconvenient, I strip the DRM from every Kindle book I buy. Because of that, I was able to "lend" the book to my wife without having to go without my own (physical) Kindle for the duration. Yeah, I know - I'm a hardened criminal and should be in the slammer. But I have access to my purchased ebooks and will be able to use them as common sense dictates, with or without Amazon's blessing.

If Amazon ever makes removing DRM impossible, I won't be buying from them.

Comment: Re:Fuck. (Score 2) 397

by 93 Escort Wagon (#43778347) Attached to: Google Drops XMPP Support

I think it's safe to say that the state of instant messaging is truly fucked right about now.

Google seems to keep making bone-headed moves it thinks will drive people to actually start using its moribund Google+ network; and, like all the past moves, it almost certainly will not work.

I say this somewhat - but not completely - tongue in cheek: Will we see a day when Google decides Android phones can no longer do SMS, because "our new GMS (Google Messaging Service) provides a superior messaging platform through integration with your Google+ circles"?

Comment: Re:Discontinued? (Score 3, Interesting) 56

by 93 Escort Wagon (#43769113) Attached to: Google's Nexus Q Successor Hits the FCC

Roku boxes and Apple TVs can already do this AND offer access to external services like Netflix and Hulu - for under a hundred bucks. Heck, my LG television has a Plex client built in - no extra box is even needed to get at my own stuff.

So I'm not sure why most people would be interested in a box that only handles local content - but maybe you mean "local" differently than I'm interpreting it.

Comment: Re:Why (Score 1) 193

by 93 Escort Wagon (#43763831) Attached to: UK Consumers Reporting Contactless Payment Errors

You cannot clone the chip; it has an internal cryptographic secret it does not allow you to access, only challenge responses.

Yeah, you're making two claims here, neither of which I believe.

Yes, this is how the system is designed to work. But it's a very complicated system that was designed by humans. People make mistakes in implementation, and tomorrow people will know things they don't know today. I've seen too many claims similar to yours fail in the past to really believe the designers of NFC thought of everything.

Comment: Re:Why (Score 1) 193

by 93 Escort Wagon (#43763775) Attached to: UK Consumers Reporting Contactless Payment Errors

It reminds me of the phone pay-with-phone thing. I have to carry a wallet anyway for ID and other important documents (and yes, cash, which is the ultimate fall-back and non-tracking/anonymous payment method). Yes, I will also carry my phone. So it is somehow faster and more convenient to take my phone out of my holster, turn it "on", unlock it, launch a payment app, enter some stuff, position it correctly on a terminal, press some confirmation keys, turn it back off, and put it back into its holster. That is faster?

Wait... You keep your phone in a holster? And off?

Your issues with the payment app system aren't really anything that affects most other people. My phone, for example, is in my pocket - and on. Getting at it isn't any more work than pulling my wallet out of a pocket, and launching an app is as fast as finding the correct card somewhere in my wallet.

Heck, my wallet isn't even in my pocket, more often than not. It's usually buried in my computer bag.

"Whom are you?" said he, for he had been to night school. -- George Ade

Working...