Forgot your password?

typodupeerror

Submission Summary: 0 pending, 3 declined, 0 accepted (3 total, 0.00% accepted)

Iroquois team refused UK visas RFID passport chips-> 1

Submitted by 56ker
56ker writes "I found this interesting story on Yahoo (there are other news stories too) about the Iroquois team being refused UK visas to travel to the UK as part of the once every four year world lacrosse championship.

It seems the sticking point is that as a sovereign nation within the United States (and Canada) they issue their own passports. As these are just paper passports (like the big black passports we used to use for years before joining the European Union) and don't have digital photos and RFID tags the lacrosse teams have been turned down for visas by the local British embassy or consulate.

My grandfather's passport (which I still have) which has no RFID tags got him into France before they were invaded by the Germans in the 1940s. According to the article the first game the Iroquois have is against England.

One of the ironies of the situation is that in the UK we have different nations; England, Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland, each with their own national team. Why can't the native American or First Nation Canadians be recognised in this way? Their sense of identity and nationality is the tribal group they belong to. Understandably regarding their history they have strong feelings about having a Yankee or Canadian passport.

If the US will let them leave (which they have with a one-time waiver) and they've got return tickets, what's the problem (or is it just a cunning way for England to win by default against a better team)? ;)

As usual comments, including personal or otherwise stories about strange immigration decisions.

P.S. Anyone any idea how to get the spellchecker on livejournal to use British English by default rather than American English?

In the interests of open journalism, the author of this article is married to a person of native Lakota Sioux descent born on a reservation in Canada, who now lives in the UK."

Link to Original Source
Censorship

Blog comments and libel laws

Submitted by
56ker
56ker writes "I have a blog, written in the UK and published in America. A guy rang my home phone, mobile phone repeatedly yesterday (and emailed me) as he objected to a comment a third party (an American) had left on the blog calling him illiterate. Apart from first referring to livejournal as Myspace it turns out he wants me to "get rid" of the comment (despite not being the author or publisher) otherwise he'll sue me for libel. The comment in question was written last year around December 4th-5th. The question is — as a person who can edit the content on my blog do I have to comply with his request? Can he sue me for such a matter and should I ask the person who left the comment to delete/rephrase it or wait for a lawsuit? What are the laws that apply to comments left in blogs by third parties (only other case I can think of is Shoemoney). Any advice anyone? P.S. The UK libel laws do not apply to Six Apart (who publish livejournal) or the commenter — but they do to me as "editor" — which set of laws applies anyway?"

Great minds run in great circles.

Working...