I noticed a few people reacting to the 3,727, as if it was some sort of brute-force attack to get a URL.
If that was 3,727 requests to the http server, I think that wouldn't be very much. That is, reading a web page with graphical elements would, I would think, involve a dozen or so http requests -- more if there were lots of little icons and what not. Two journalists looking at a dozen such web pages a few times each would run up that number pretty quickly. (Can someone with more networking experience than I have check my thinking?)
And, of course, a decent firewall logs all requests, including legitimate requests.
So, I would guess that this is just the politician grabbing a number that sounds large to him, and ascribing significance it doesn't have.