What about those dozen or so people the US army lined up in the targets of their guns and blew to bits in Baghdad?
They were all civilians, two were Reuters staff, two were children.

http://collateralmurder.com/

Of course we only know what was leaked, there are likely many more killings we don't know about. This shows a clear intent to murder civilians.

What about Iran Air Flight 655 - 3 July 1988 ?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iran_Air_Flight_655

The people that flew the planes into the buildings are already dead. Before they attacked you they made the decision that they would be willing to die if it meant striking back at their perceived oppressor, the US.

While the US is killing random targets they are creating more and more potential terrorists who will go to greater and greater extremes to get revenge.

If the US stops killing people today it will have less terrorists to deal with in the next 30 or so years.

But these people are not shot, they are blown to bits along with everyone else within about 100 meters. That's a grossly excessive response to some loonies firing guns at empty airspace. Besides, not all the weddings that got bombed were due to loonies firing guns in the air.

Weddings are a big deal in these cultures. China doesn't bomb you whenever you hold a BBQ for friends and family do they?

Imagine what something like stuxnet could do to soldiers with brain implants.

And if you run out of resources before you kill everyone else? US military spending is unsustainable and pushing the national debt to insane levels. High tech comes at a high cost and brain implants are not going to change that.

And maybe grabbing all the oil and installing a puppet government while you are at it. Face it, it's "ways of killing people" to justify military spending the can't be paid for while more important things get no funding whatsoever.

A single functional implant makes you a cyborg as long as that implant has some synthetic electrical component.

It's use of company ( i.e.police ) resources for personal reasons. It's simple theft and the police can get away with it because they are above the law.

Have you considered that maybe you are smarter than 10 cops?

Don't forget the corruption too! 10 police look for one stolen kids iphone while how many other more serious crimes got ignored?

Whoever ordered these 10 cops to go waste time the state is paying for should be disciplined for corruption. Using company resources for personal reasons is at best corruption and at worst theft.

Everything to do with facebook is bad for our freedoms and privacy. The whole point of it is to take information entered by dumb people and index it.

It's the perfect CIA ( or whoever ) data collection tool.

He would never have got involved in facebook in the first place. It's not an understandable investment, it's not a safe investment, it's strongly overvalued and although google+ was a failure the next thing might not be.

I suspect the great majority of people who brought facebook shares really should not be buying shares at all. They are the wreckless investors who lose all their money in the long term.

I run Linux and OpenBSD and software with GPL, BSD, or other free licences for all my personal stuff. I have everything I need and more for free.

On the other hand at work we often get people asking us to save a few hundred by buying Windows student edition or wanting to install software on multiple machines when we have licensed it for only one. I won't do it, we either pay for the correct license or we don't use it. It's one thing for a home user to rip off some software but companies never should.

Why would they? What would the Chinese government gain by flooding the solar panels market with things that cost more than they sell for?