Forgot your password?

typodupeerror

Comment: Re:We're not dead, but an old server is. (Score 2) 252

by 101percent (#39829145) Attached to: Slackware: I'm Not Dead Yet!
First understand this: Slackware is Patrick's bread-and-butter. Granted I'm not too sharp on network management etc... but perhaps he wants his server to be within his control and not floating around in some nebulous cloud. He's been a dedicated GNU/Linux community member/leader for decades, so you should stop being such an ass and realize that as you get older you stick to the things you know; brick-and-mortar real servers which you have control over, the way it has been done for decades. He's not trying to build an empire; from the interviews I've read/heard he's just a down-to-earth guy that likes plays music and lives simply. Why would he try to expand, especially if it means giving up (albiet not too much) control over what provides his income. What's next, Steven King writing/storing his next novel on Google Documents?

Comment: Re:Debian (Score 2) 252

by 101percent (#39829017) Attached to: Slackware: I'm Not Dead Yet!
The parent has no relevance to this article. What does debian's survivability have anything to do with slackware's webserver going down and a new project based on slackware (of which there are many). Besides, slackware has been around as long as Debian. Ian Murdoc tried to recruit Patrick Volkerding for the Debian project at its beginning, but Pat respectfully declined and went ahead with Slackware. I'll give you Debian's survivability, but Slackware is just as old with far less resources than Debian. To use seniority as leverage to dismiss slackware shows you know nothing. This is the wrong way to promote Debian, which is a wonderful project which proves itself without such tactics. Since you don't mention any of these features, you again prove you know nothing.

Thousands of days of civilians ... have produced a ... feeling for the aesthetic modules --

Working...