Comment: Re:Back, to the Future... (Score 1) 202
Comment: Better idea - Don't feed the beast! (Score 1) 834
Comment: Re:Antivirus Software on a Mac (Score 1) 285
That's not true any more. Most of the infections we have to address at work are coming through the ad networks. A harmless site spinning content from a company that puts up anything where a check clears. Local radio stations are the worst with a little player surrounded by ads from various providers.
Comment: Re:Welcome to our world (Score 1) 1205
Comment: Re:Failed big time (Score 1) 304
Ah right, I sit corrected. No minimum that I was affected by
There's also the Farnell-owned CPC, which is a lot more open to consumers (they even have a recently expanded shop now in Preston that you can wander around and browse in) and I note that they're using the "register to express an interest" model for those who prefer that to pre-ordering.
Comment: Re:Failed big time (Score 2) 304
I pre-ordered from Farnell with no issue at all. No minimum amount, no company details (it's geared at that, but I ignored it), and "Home / Hobby" was even an option in the list of job roles.
Comment: Re:Makes sense. (Score 1) 1040
Indeed.
Got to find it amusing that it takes in-depth research to prove the bleedingly obvious, and quite surprising that it triggered debate IMO
People rarely (if ever) get rich by being fair, honest and following the law to the letter. They get rich by being "go-getters" and not letting anything stand in the way.
It's all in getting away with it. The more someone can get away with trampling on people, breaking laws / morality etc without repercussions ("getting away with it" includes internal sense of guilt/remorse), by nature, the further they will succeed in getting what they want while others who get away with it less hold back.
You could go right the way back to cave men. The one who knocks everyone out and has the meat to himself isn't *nice*, but he's still the one who didn't go hungry.